On Fri, Feb 08, 2013 at 04:58:20PM +0200, Engel Nyst wrote:
Point taken. Completely unrelated to yesterday's issue, I have
done this as
well. I apologize. I can think of a couple circumstances when my random use of
different sites (all three mentioned here) to provide feedback or potential
issues, might pose problems from the perspective of the normal communication
through the project's primary medium.
I believe many were unbaked comments or random ideas exchanges, due more to
lack of expertise (or arguably even attention), and not intended as actual
proposals. However, I have also submitted a couple issues, intended as
proposals for copyleft-next, on github, or as comment to existing github
issues. The first has been on github by mistake/inertia: I have initially
missed the project's policy, thus I have submitted a pull request on github. I
have immediately afterwards switched to gitorious, for subsequent merge
requests.
As for me, I was happy to receive such comments and ideas, regardless
of medium. The only problem from my perspective was the practical one
of having too many things to keep track of. I didn't say anything
because I didn't want to discourage such participation. Same goes with
pchestek. So I suppose the one mistake I made was active use of the
GitHub issue tracker, yet this was not really a mistake because a few
days earlier I had a presentation slide that said that the GitHub
issue tracker was appropriate for use for the time being. Nevertheless
I do not anticipate making further active use of the GitHub issue
tracker at this time.
- RF