On 03/28/2014 11:07 AM, Richard Fontana wrote:
On Fri, 28 Mar 2014 07:08:00 -0700
Luis Villa <luis(a)lu.is> wrote:
> Note that a quasi LAGPL need not be less restrictive than AGPL; it
> could serve a similar purpose merely by resolving the uncertainty you
> point out about the scope of AGPL.
I have had similar thoughts. This is all related to the "epiphany"
bkuhn confessed to experiencing at (a?) Bertucci's in Cambridge, Mass.
on Saturday, 22 March 2014, at approximately 21:00 EDT, in the course
of a conversation about the notion of LAGPL with, primarily, Chris
Webber and me.
[...]
Apart from all that, I intend to respond substantively to Tom's message
in due course.
I realize we are all quite busy.
I recently became aware of some old concerns about the DSFG-freeness
of the AGPL and thought it might be apropos to this discussion
(and potential fixes in copyleft-next).
https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2014/05/msg00210.html
For the record: while I did attend LibrePlanet I was not a party
to the "epiphany" and do not know what it was about.
Regards,
--Tom