automatic packaging, tools goal

[Marcela Mašláňová]

Hi guys,
I guess we had a very productive conversation yesterday. I tried to sum 
up all ideas in my blogpost. Do you thing we can create from those ideas 
our first goal for PRD?

http://mmaslano.livejournal.com/8905.html

For next week we should pick another topic and discuss another big 
issue. Guidelines, documentation? Cartridges? Images and which kind of 
images (vagrant, docker.io)? I was trying to find out persons interested 
in these areas, but no luck yet.

Marcela

[Tadej Janež]

Marcela,

On Wed, 2013-11-27 at 15:48 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote: 
>  I guess we had a very productive conversation yesterday. I tried to
> sum 
>  up all ideas in my blogpost. 
thank you for writing it down and giving it some structure.

>  Do you thing we can create from those ideas 
>  our first goal for PRD? 
Definitely. I'm not very familiar with how the PRDs are usually
structured and into how much detail they go, but I think we could build
on what you wrote. 

>  For next week we should pick another topic and discuss another big 
>  issue. Guidelines, documentation? Cartridges? Images and which kind of 
>  images (vagrant, docker.io)? I was trying to find out persons interested 
>  in these areas, but no luck yet. 
Yes, agreed. There's been some discussion surrounding guidelines and
documentation on the ML, so maybe we can nail it down to some concrete
goals in the meeting.

I would add some other topics to your list:
1) Development environment(s). Actually, this would be something to do
with the first part of our WG's name. We can build on Slavek's idea and
try to define to what extent this is in the scope of our WG and how does
it complement/intersect with the goals of the Workstation WG.
2) Extension packages for multiple interpreters of dynamic languages.
Again, we can build on Slavek's idea.
3) SCLv2. I would like to discuss to what extent will this be a part of
our WG? What will be the role of other bodies, such as FPC?

Tadej

[Marcela Mašláňová]

On 12/03/2013 01:00 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
>  3) SCLv2. I would like to discuss to what extent will this be a part
> of
>  our WG? What will be the role of other bodies, such as FPC? 
I can't speak for Jan. Let's ask him.

Marcela

[Jan Zelený]

On 3. 12. 2013 at 17:47:20, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>  On 12/03/2013 01:00 PM, Tadej Janež wrote:
>  > 3) SCLv2. I would like to discuss to what extent will this be a part of
>  > our WG? What will be the role of other bodies, such as FPC?
>  
>  I can't speak for Jan. Let's ask him. 
I'm not exactly sure what do you mean by "this". I don't intend
scl-utils to 
be part of any WG. Note that if scl-utils.next are incompatible with scl-
utils.current Both versions will coexist in Fedora for some time so you don't 
need to worry about incompatible changes that would suddenly hit either SCL 
maintainers or users.

That being said, I can definitely keep you posted about the development and I 
most certainly accept any requests/recommendations for the new version. I am 
in contact with Marcela so she is usually informed about what's going on and 
she can be our liaison. I mean unless there is a something more complex to 
discuss in which case I'll inform you myself.

Thanks
Jan

[Honza Horak]

Just a note regarding automatic packaging. I mentioned rpm-rebase tool 
during one of our meetings and promissed I'd find out what it's current 
state is. So, it has no official project page anywhere yet and most of 
the ideas are on the paper so far; the implementation is in very early 
state and waits for more time of developers (talked to thozza at 
redhat). I'll try to get involved in the further discussion and help 
guys to have something working soon.

Honza

On 11/27/2013 03:48 PM, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
>  Hi guys,
>  I guess we had a very productive conversation yesterday. I tried to sum
>  up all ideas in my blogpost. Do you thing we can create from those ideas
>  our first goal for PRD?
>
>  http://mmaslano.livejournal.com/8905.html
>
>  For next week we should pick another topic and discuss another big
>  issue. Guidelines, documentation? Cartridges? Images and which kind of
>  images (vagrant, docker.io)? I was trying to find out persons interested
>  in these areas, but no luck yet.
>
>  Marcela
>  _______________________________________________
>  env-and-stacks mailing list
>  env-and-stacks(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/env-and-stacks