On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 7:18 PM, David Malcolm <dmalcolm(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 17:56 +0200, Matthieu Caneill wrote:
> I use the Coccinelle [1] static analyzer (which I've instrumented to
> support Firehose output), and it can process different kind of
> (possibly user-defined) tests. It could be useful to add a variable in
> the issue element to categorize more precisely the type of error; and
> any other tool which supports different kind of tests would benefit
> from such an extension. Such an element could be called "error-type"
> or "check-name". What do you think about this? I can submit a pull
> request if you agree with this.
Isn't this just the test-id attribute of <issue> ?
I didn't see this like an error type, but after re-reading its
description it seems that it's the corresponding item. Thanks!
--
Matthieu