Re: wesnoth 1.4
>>>>> "JC" == Jon Ciesla
<limb(a)jcomserv.net> writes:
JC> Even to preserve other existing functionality, i.e. network play?
Yes, because that functionality doesn't break due to the fact that an
update was pushed. I feel that taking an affirmative action to break
things is worse than taking no action and having other things broken.
If you like, push an update that, when started, opens a dialog
explaining the situation. It is also theoretically possible to push a
wesnoth14 package which users could install after removing the
existing package, but that gets a bit complicated and isn't really
pleasant.
So it'd be preferable to leave it in rawhide, add something to the release
notes for F9, and call it done?
- J<
--
novus ordo absurdum