July 2011 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 708473] Review Request: mingw32-cxxtest - cxxtest for mingw32

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 --- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-07-21 11:21:39 EDT --- mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-5.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1-5.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 708473] Review Request: mingw32-cxxtest - cxxtest for mingw32

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 --- Comment #12 from Adam Stokes <astokes(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-21 10:47:37 EDT --- (In reply to comment #9) > I'm re-opening this review ticket as I don't agree with the 'review' which was > done here. The .spec file which is attached here doesn't even build in mock! > The .spec file which was imported in rawhide is in a bit better shape, but > still not compliant with the general Fedora packaging guidelines and the > MinGW-specific packaging guidelines: > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW > > I'll do a proper review now based on what's now in rawhide (3.10.1-4.fc16). > > The Source0 and Source1 URL's are invalid: > $ spectool -g mingw32-cxxtest.spec > Getting > http://cxxtest.tigris.org/files/documents/6421/43281/mingw32-cxxtest-3.10... > to ./mingw32-cxxtest-3.10.1.tar.gz > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current > Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 > curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 > Getting > http://cxxtest.tigris.org/files/documents/6421/43284/mingw32-cxxtest-guid... > to ./mingw32-cxxtest-guide-3.10.1.pdf > % Total % Received % Xferd Average Speed Time Time Time Current > Dload Upload Total Spent Left Speed > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 --:--:-- --:--:-- --:--:-- 0 > curl: (22) The requested URL returned error: 404 > > Please use working URLs or add a comment how the .tar.gz can be regenerated > > As your only targeting F-15 and rawhide, several things can be dropped from the > .spec file like the BuildRoot tag, the 'rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT' from the > %install phase, the entire %clean section and the %defattr lines from both > subpackages. The conditionals for fedora < 11 and rhel can also be dropped as > they're unneeded when you only target F-15 and rawhide. > > Why are you bundling the python pieces with this package? We don't have python > support in the MinGW toolchain in Fedora so the python pieces are kinda > useless. The python code and the -doc subpackage are also bundled with the > native Fedora cxxtest package so they can both the dropped from the mingw > package. > > Is it correct that this package only provides some C++ header files? If that's > the case then the two %global overrides can be dropped as they only apply to > mingw binaries. Do note however that when this package starts to bundle > binaries that several overrides need to be added (for dependency and debuginfo > extraction). See the Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines for an example. > > If you aren't bundling any mingw binaries then you need add to a Requires: > mingw32-filesystem manually. > > Why was this package imported as mingw32-cxxtest? The current Fedora MinGW > guidelines strongly suggest to name new packages mingw-, so that in the future > it would be easier to build mingw64- binary packages. Now that you've used > mingw32- source package naming, you'll have to retire mingw32-cxxtest and > re-review mingw-cxxtest once the mingw64 compiler is ready, probably in the F17 > timeframe Just for my benefit what happens to the existing mingw32 packages that are already in the distro? Will we be doing a mass rename of these when the compiler is ready? Thanks -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 708473] Review Request: mingw32-cxxtest - cxxtest for mingw32

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 --- Comment #11 from Adam Stokes <astokes(a)redhat.com> 2011-07-21 10:33:51 EDT --- (In reply to comment #10) > Created attachment 514160 [details] > Patch to address issues pointed out by Erik > > Adam and Roman: To help you guys out, I am attaching a patch which should > hopefully address all the issues pointed out by Erik. Very awesome, thank you so much. I'll run some quick tests and post an updated package. Thanks again -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 708473] Review Request: mingw32-cxxtest - cxxtest for mingw32

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708473 --- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-21 04:17:10 EDT --- Created attachment 514160 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=514160 Patch to address issues pointed out by Erik Adam and Roman: To help you guys out, I am attaching a patch which should hopefully address all the issues pointed out by Erik. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[pkgdb] mingw32-libjpeg (un)retirement

by Fedora PackageDB

Package mingw32-libjpeg in Fedora devel has been retired by rjones To make changes to this package see: https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/mingw32-libjpeg

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages in F-16 (final warning)

by Kalev Lember

Hi, Erik mentioned yesterday on IRC that mingw32-physfs is going to be retired unless someone picks it up; I'm forwarding the mail here just in case someone is interested. On 07/20/2011 10:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages. > It's that time again for Fedora 16. > > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have > failed to build since before Fedora 14. > > The following packages are currently orphaned, or fail to build. If > you have a need for one of these packages, please pick them up. > > If not claimed, the packages will be blocked on Monday, July 25. > [snip] > Orphan mingw32-physfs > comaintained by: rjones

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[mingw32-libjpeg] Package has been replaced by mingw-libjpeg-turbo

by Erik van Pienbroek

commit 3d27291e183dafe94e2f566bdc4ce6fc5850999e Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Thu Jul 21 01:47:54 2011 +0200 Package has been replaced by mingw-libjpeg-turbo dead.package | 2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/dead.package b/dead.package index f2396d2..32bc236 100644 --- a/dead.package +++ b/dead.package @@ -1 +1 @@ -Package is retired \ No newline at end of file +Package is retired, replaced by mingw-libjpeg-turbo

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[mingw32-libjpeg] Package is retired

by Erik van Pienbroek

commit 67032572916051237614ba908c5baedb1784bd8e Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Thu Jul 21 01:46:08 2011 +0200 Package is retired .gitignore | 1 - configure.in | 346 ------ dead.package | 1 + jpeg-fix-typo.patch | 11 - jpeg-mingw32.patch | 12 - jpeg-workaround-typedef-conflict.patch | 1877 -------------------------------- libjpeg-autoconf.patch | 30 - libjpeg-buf-oflo.patch | 25 - libjpeg-cflags.patch | 20 - mingw32-libjpeg.spec | 174 --- sources | 1 - 11 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2497 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/dead.package b/dead.package new file mode 100644 index 0000000..f2396d2 --- /dev/null +++ b/dead.package @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Package is retired \ No newline at end of file

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 704635] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704635 --- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> 2011-07-19 13:09:04 EDT --- mingw-gstreamer-0.10.35-2.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/mingw-gstreamer-0.10.35-2.fc15 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 704635] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704635 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |MODIFIED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw July 2011