July 2011 - mingw - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 704635] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704635 --- Comment #9 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2011-07-19 10:30:07 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 704635] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704635 Paweł Forysiuk <tuxator(a)o2.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |NEW Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #8 from Paweł Forysiuk <tuxator(a)o2.pl> 2011-07-19 10:03:51 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-gstreamer Short Description: MinGW Windows gstreamer library Owners: pfor epienbro Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 722707] Review Request: mingw-libvorbis - MinGW Windows libvorbis library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Fixed In Version| |mingw-libvorbis-1.3.2-1.fc1 | |5 Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-07-19 09:54:41 --- Comment #12 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-19 09:54:41 EDT --- Package imported and built for rawhide and F15; closing the ticket. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 704635] Review Request: mingw-gstreamer - MinGW Windows gstreamer library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=704635 Paweł Forysiuk <tuxator(a)o2.pl> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|177841(FE-NEEDSPONSOR) | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 722707] Review Request: mingw-libvorbis - MinGW Windows libvorbis library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla <limb(a)jcomserv.net> 2011-07-19 08:41:52 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 722707] Review Request: mingw-libvorbis - MinGW Windows libvorbis library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 --- Comment #10 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-19 07:21:10 EDT --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-libvorbis Short Description: MinGW Windows libvorbis library Owners: kalev pfor Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 722707] Review Request: mingw-libvorbis - MinGW Windows libvorbis library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-19 05:59:50 EDT --- Thanks for the review, Randy! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-libvorbis Short Description: MinGW Windows libvorbis library Owners: kalev pfor elmarco Branches: f15 InitialCC: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 722707] Review Request: mingw-libvorbis - MinGW Windows libvorbis library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 Randall "Randy" Berry <randyn3lrx(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |randyn3lrx(a)gmail.com Flag| |fedora-review+ --- Comment #8 from Randall "Randy" Berry <randyn3lrx(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-18 12:48:52 EDT --- Works for me. Thanks for helping me understand the process with mingw packages. = Approved = -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 722707] Review Request: mingw-libvorbis - MinGW Windows libvorbis library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 --- Comment #7 from Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-18 04:32:38 EDT --- (In reply to comment #6) > Built packages should be named by prefixing the upstream package name with > mingw32- These are the binary rpms, upstream name (libvorbis) prefixed with mingw32-: mingw32-libvorbis-1.3.2-1.fc16.noarch.rpm mingw32-libvorbis-debuginfo-1.3.2-1.fc16.noarch.rpm > Source packages can be named starting with mingw- in order to more easily > support a transition to the new MinGW guidelines which mandate that naming. > Otherwise two separate package repositories must be set up ("mingw32-foo" and > "mingw-foo") with one needing to be marked EOL. This is the source package, starts with mingw- like the guidelines say: mingw-libvorbis-1.3.2-1.fc16.src.rpm The guidelines aren't particularly well worded here, but the idea is that in the future (F17 timeframe) we are going to build TWO sets of binary rpms from one source package, that's what the "support a transition to the new MinGW guidelines" sentence in guidelines means. mingw-libfoo.src.rpm mingw32-libfoo.rpm mingw64-libfoo.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 722707] Review Request: mingw-libvorbis - MinGW Windows libvorbis library

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=722707 --- Comment #6 from Randall "Randy" Berry <randyn3lrx(a)gmail.com> 2011-07-17 06:24:41 EDT --- (In reply to comment #4) > Actually, the naming is OK. Now that I do further research shouldn't the name be mingw32-libvorbis so that it matches the naming scheme of the mingw32 packages? https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/MinGW#Package_naming Package naming Built packages should be named by prefixing the upstream package name with mingw32- Source packages can be named starting with mingw- in order to more easily support a transition to the new MinGW guidelines which mandate that naming. Otherwise two separate package repositories must be set up ("mingw32-foo" and "mingw-foo") with one needing to be marked EOL. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

12 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw July 2011