mingw July 2013

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
126 discussions

[Bug 961408] Review Request: mingw-tesseract - MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O8IZ8qtql7&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 979564] Review Request: mingw-sane-backends - MinGW package for SANE
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979564 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> --- Must fix: - mingw{32,64}-pthreads BR are missing - ftp://ftp.sane-project.org seems down (temporary?), so Source0 does not work. - License breakdown must be documented [1] - Requires of -static subpackages are incorrect. (The way I do it is to define %pkgname with the native package name, and then prefix it with mingw32 and mingw64 as necessary, i.e. %global pkgname sane-backends [...] Requires: mingw32-%{pkgname} = %{version}-%{release} [...] Requires: mingw64-%{pkgname} = %{version}-%{release} ) - Unowned directories: * %{mingw32/64_includedir}/sane * %{mingw32_sysconfdir}/sane.d Should fix: - BuildRoot is not required anymore since F10 [2] - %defattr is not needed anymore - Add a comment explaining the patch - Rpmlint warnings/errors: * mingw32-sane-backends.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sane/saneopts.h * mingw32-sane-backends.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw32-sane-backends-1.0.23/COPYING * mingw32-sane-backends-static.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Static version of the Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) universal scanner interface. * mingw32-sane-backends-static.noarch: E: summary-too-long C Static version of the Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) universal scanner interface. * mingw32-sane-backends-static.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C Static version of the Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) universal scanner interface. * mingw32-sane-backends-static.noarch: W: no-documentation * mingw64-sane-backends.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Static version of the Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) universal scanner interface. * mingw64-sane-backends.noarch: E: summary-too-long C Static version of the Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) universal scanner interface. * mingw64-sane-backends.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/doc/mingw64-sane-backends-1.0.23/COPYING * mingw64-sane-backends.noarch: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/x86_64-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/include/sane/saneopts.h * mingw64-sane-backends-static.noarch: W: summary-ended-with-dot C Static version of the Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) universal scanner interface. * mingw64-sane-backends-static.noarch: E: summary-too-long C Static version of the Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) universal scanner interface. * mingw64-sane-backends-static.noarch: E: description-line-too-long C Static version of the Scanner Access Now Easy (SANE) universal scanner interface. * mingw64-sane-backends-static.noarch: W: no-documentation [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging/L… [2] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#BuildRoot_tag -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=zQ30dLEV5v&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 961408] Review Request: mingw-tesseract - MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 --- Comment #4 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=83yzHhT0ta&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 961408] Review Request: mingw-tesseract - MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-cvs? |fedora-cvs+ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=ClsiL8te9Z&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 961408] Review Request: mingw-tesseract - MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #3 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> --- Spec URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/mingw-tesseract.spec SRPM URL: http://smani.fedorapeople.org/mingw-tesseract-3.02.02-3.fc20.src.rpm * Thu Jul 11 2013 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> - 3.02.02-3 - Fix Source0 URL Thanks Michael! New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: mingw-tesseract Short Description: MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library Owners: smani Branches: f18 f19 InitialCC: -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kV3tPIW0cP&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 961408] Review Request: mingw-tesseract - MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #2 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> --- $ rpmlint mingw-tesseract-3.02.02-2.fc20.src.rpm \ mingw32-tesseract-3.02.02-2.fc18.noarch.rpm \ mingw32-tesseract-static-3.02.02-2.fc18.noarch.rpm \ mingw32-tesseract-tools-3.02.02-2.fc18.noarch.rpm \ mingw64-tesseract-3.02.02-2.fc18.noarch.rpm \ mingw64-tesseract-static-3.02.02-2.fc18.noarch.rpm mingw64-tesseract-tools-3.02.02-2.fc18.noarch.rpm \ mingw32-tesseract-debuginfo-3.02.02-2.fc18.noarch.rpm \ mingw64-tesseract-debuginfo-3.02.02-2.fc18.noarch.rpm mingw-tesseract.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw-tesseract.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw-tesseract.src: W: invalid-url Source0: http://leptonica.googlecode.com/files/tesseract-ocr-3.02.02.tar.gz HTTP Error 404: Not Found mingw32-tesseract.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw32-tesseract.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw32-tesseract-static.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw32-tesseract-static.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw32-tesseract-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-tesseract-tools.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw32-tesseract-tools.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw32-tesseract-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-tesseract.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw64-tesseract.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw64-tesseract-static.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw64-tesseract-static.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw64-tesseract-static.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw64-tesseract-tools.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw64-tesseract-tools.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US ocr -> OCR, cor, or mingw64-tesseract-tools.noarch: W: no-documentation mingw32-tesseract-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources mingw64-tesseract-debuginfo.noarch: E: debuginfo-without-sources 9 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 19 warnings. The only warning that is of concern is the download link. Looks like a typo. Should be: http://tesseract-ocr.googlecode.com/files/tesseract-ocr-%{version}.tar.gz + OK ! needs attention + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package + The package contains the license file (COPYING.lib) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 26adc8154f0e815053816825dde246e6 Downloads/tesseract-ocr-3.02.02.tar.gz 26adc8154f0e815053816825dde246e6 SOURCES/tesseract-ocr-3.02.02.tar.gz + The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a locale handling n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Not applicable to MinGW packages. + Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages must not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 ----------- Summary: - The review is for "tesseract" when upstream is "tesseract-ocr". I see the native Fedora package is "tesseract" so I will pass it here. - Just fix the SOURCE0 url and you are good to go! APPROVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=T8lCdgz0rf&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 961408] Review Request: mingw-tesseract - MinGW Windows tesseract-ocr library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=961408 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mike(a)cchtml.com Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=RwFBnyY1xe&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 979564] Review Request: mingw-sane-backends - MinGW package for SANE
by Red Hat Bugzilla 11 Jul '13

11 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979564 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |manisandro(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |manisandro(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=O6sWblmRBs&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

Some packages still affected by InterlockedCompareExchange regression
by Sandro Mani 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

Hi, I'm still hitting the InterlockedCompareExchange regression described here [1] (i.e. entry point for InterlockedCompareExchange@12 could not be located in libintl-8.dll), and noticed that some packages are still affected, that is still have the symbol in the dll. I've found one package (i.e. mingw-gtkspellmm30 which I've taken care to rebuild) which, although rebuilt to fix the issue, ended up still having InterlockedCompareExchange@12 in the symbol table, as well as another one which was not rebuilt at all, i.e. mingw-openssl. Unfortunately, I'm not sure which is the best way to find out which packages need to be (re-)rebuilt? (This is on rawhide btw.) - Sandro [1] http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.gnu.mingw.w64.general/7411

2 6

[mingw-glib2] Update to 2.37.4
by Erik van Pienbroek 10 Jul '13

10 Jul '13

commit 1d46ad1d547f1720756d717ff85319ae44e0dca8 Author: Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> Date: Wed Jul 10 19:25:09 2013 +0200 Update to 2.37.4 mingw-glib2.spec | 7 +++++-- sources | 2 +- 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- diff --git a/mingw-glib2.spec b/mingw-glib2.spec index 3bf06ea..eea49ec 100644 --- a/mingw-glib2.spec +++ b/mingw-glib2.spec @@ -1,8 +1,8 @@ %?mingw_package_header Name: mingw-glib2 -Version: 2.37.3 -Release: 2%{?dist} +Version: 2.37.4 +Release: 1%{?dist} Summary: MinGW Windows GLib2 library License: LGPLv2+ @@ -282,6 +282,9 @@ find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name "*.la" -delete %changelog +* Wed Jul 10 2013 Erik van Pienbroek <epienbro(a)fedoraproject.org> - 2.37.4-1 +- Update to 2.37.4 + * Thu Jun 27 2013 Kalev Lember <kalevlember(a)gmail.com> - 2.37.3-2 - Include the COPYING file in %%doc (thanks daumas for noticing it!) diff --git a/sources b/sources index a29a3f0..effe0bb 100644 --- a/sources +++ b/sources @@ -1 +1 @@ -89377eed733ceaf4a6b2506897160c7e glib-2.37.3.tar.xz +614f3b63ea1f012c5ed370bf3e101872 glib-2.37.4.tar.xz

1 0

← Newer
1
...
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw July 2013