mingw July 2013

mingw@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
126 discussions

Start a nNew thread

[Bug 979566] Review Request: mingw-postgresql - MinGW Windows PostgreSQL library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '13

14 Jul '13

1 0

[Bug 979566] Review Request: mingw-postgresql - MinGW Windows PostgreSQL library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '13

14 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566 --- Comment #2 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> --- (In reply to Sandro Mani from comment #1) > (Maybe add a comment on why the links are necessary? Package seems to build > also without the links, though I have not verified its functionality) Required to build on F18 at least or you get a build failure: /usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32-dlltool: Can't open def file: libpqdll.def /usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32-dllwrap: /usr/bin/i686-w64-mingw32-dlltool exited with status 1 > Note: These BR are not needed: gawk Copied from postgresql.spec. If you want to file a bug with them be my guest. New spec: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-postgresql.spec New SRPM: http://michael.cronenworth.com/RPMS/mingw-postgresql-9.2.4-2.fc18.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=myTRnUDGgR&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 984248] Review Request: mingw-shapelib - MinGW Windows shapelib library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '13

14 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984248 --- Comment #1 from Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> --- + OK ! needs attention + The package is named according to Fedora MinGW packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. ! The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The stated license is the same as the one for the corresponding native Fedora package ! The package contains the license file (COPYING.lib) + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match sources in the srpm. md5sum: 2ff7d0b21d4b7506b452524492795f77 Downloads/shapelib-1.3.0.tar.gz 2ff7d0b21d4b7506b452524492795f77 SOURCES/shapelib-1.3.0.tar.gz ! The package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed ! BuildRequires look sane n/a locale handling n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect package n/a Header files should be in -devel Not applicable to MinGW packages. + Static libraries should be in -static n/a Library files that end in .so must go in a -devel package n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base + Packages must not contain libtool .la files n/a Packages containing GUI apps must include %{name}.desktop file + Directory ownership sane + Filenames are valid UTF-8 ----- Summary: - BR for mingw64-proj, package does not exist. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=5605993 - License is missing GPLv2 and Public Domain contrib/csv2shp.c: GPL (v2 or later) contrib/dbfinfo.c: Public domain contrib/dbfcat.c: Public domain -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=kEVMi2Vqao&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 979566] Review Request: mingw-postgresql - MinGW Windows PostgreSQL library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 14 Jul '13

14 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> --- Issues: - Use macros instead of hardcoded path names, i.e. rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT/usr/i686-w64-mingw32/sys-root/mingw/bin/*.exe -> rm $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{mingw32_bindir}/*.exe - I would use %{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir} instead of the relative paths when creating the symlinks: ln -s %{_builddir}/%{buildsubdir}/src/interfaces/libpq/libpqdll.def ./build_win32/src/interfaces/libpq/ etc (Maybe add a comment on why the links are necessary? Package seems to build also without the links, though I have not verified its functionality) - Nitpicking: fedora-review says: Note: These BR are not needed: gawk See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 Rest looks good. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=cXn6mvkAM3&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

mingw32-libpng has broken dependencies in the epel-6 tree: On ppc64: mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-runtime mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32-filesystem >= 0:63 mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(zlib1.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(msvcrt.dll) mingw32-libpng-1.2.37-3.el6.noarch requires mingw32(kernel32.dll) Please resolve this as soon as possible.

1 0

Broken dependencies: mingw32-libpng
by Fedora Koji Build System 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

1 0

[Bug 984248] Review Request: mingw-shapelib - MinGW Windows shapelib library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984248 Michael Cronenworth <mike(a)cchtml.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mike(a)cchtml.com Flags| |fedora-review? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=a09qH2g2TR&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

Review swaps
by Michael Cronenworth 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

Hi all, I'd like to get my two packages in Fedora sooner rather than later. Feel free to contact me about review swaps for them. I see about 50 MinGW packages awaiting review. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979564 Thanks, Michael

2 4

[Bug 979566] Review Request: mingw-postgresql - MinGW Windows PostgreSQL library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=979566 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |manisandro(a)gmail.com Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |manisandro(a)gmail.com -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=h8ljYirhtR&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

[Bug 984248] Review Request: mingw-shapelib - MinGW Windows shapelib library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 13 Jul '13

13 Jul '13

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=984248 Sandro Mani <manisandro(a)gmail.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-mingw(a)lists.fedorapr | |oject.org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. Unsubscribe from this bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=Cf3NZPkMT2&a=cc_unsubscribe

1 0

← Newer
1
...
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
...
13
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

mingw July 2013