Re: future of mingw
fkooman(a)tuxed.net schreef op vr 03-06-2011 om 17:03 [+0200]:
On Fri, Jun 3, 2011 at 4:39 PM, Erik van Pienbroek
<erik(a)vanpienbroek.nl> wrote:
> Please don't let this all discourage you. If you (or anybody else) can
> come up with methods to making the example spec file at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:MinGW_Future more readable and
> smaller I would be glad to hear about it so we can use it for future
> mingw packages!
Not smaller, but there seems to be a typo in the example spec file:
BuildRequires: mingw32-binutils
BuildRequires: mingw32-binutils
Twice the same line, one of them should probably be
mingw64-binutils... If not, one of the lines can be removed making the
spec file smaller ;)
Thanks for spotting this. The second one is supposed to be mingw64.
I'll get this typo fixed once the legal issues surrounding mingw-w64
have been cleared and before we start enforcing the new guidelines.
Kind regards,
Erik van Pienbroek