On 11/16/2010 08:32 AM, Adam Stokes wrote:
On Mon, 15 Nov 2010 16:47:01 -0500
Laine Stump<laine(a)laine.org> wrote:
> In the meantime, after reviewing your patches last week, I noticed
> there are some functions in "suboptimal" places that should be moved
> around (eg, the unix run_program function is in netcf.c, which really
> should be platform-independent). Last week I had a quick go at moving
> things around to be better organized along platform lines, but had to
> take a break and go back to some libvirt work. I'll try and go back
> to that this week, as it may simplify your work.
Thanks Laine, anything committed yet and is there anything I can do to help?
I'm going through it again now to clean up some more stuff. I don't know
yet how comfortable I'll be with the amount of code thrash though :-/
One question: Do you have libxml2 available on Windows? I want to put
the "rng" member of the driver object into the netcf object, since it
seems to be something that will be useful no matter which platform is
being used.