Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mosml - Moscow ML
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=169704
------- Additional Comments From jpmahowald(a)gmail.com 2006-10-04 01:25 EST -------
Just recently rebuilt this on devel x86_64, and still fails at the same spot.
The very same invalid pointer, even.
However, the Array.sml that referenced is not empty.
The preprocessor referenced is /lib/cpp, which I believe is correct.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: wavbreaker - Tool for splitting .wav files
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=175127
dmaley(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583
------- Additional Comments From kevin(a)tummy.com 2006-10-03 15:20 EST -------
Excellent news. Thanks for following this discussion Kevin.
I will bring this up at the next FESCo meeting.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843
------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu 2006-10-03 12:51 EST -------
Mike, update to the latest available version, and I could review this.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706
------- Additional Comments From jima(a)beer.tclug.org 2006-10-03 11:47 EST -------
Denis and Paul: Thanks for the support. I don't like stepping on people's toes,
so it's good to see when I'm not the only one who thinks something might be a
good idea.
There's a new review open at Bug 209144.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706
------- Additional Comments From denis(a)poolshark.org 2006-10-03 11:35 EST -------
+1. Please file a new package review bug. Put a quick note that says 'don't
close me' with a reference to this bug. Thx!!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: alsa-oss - Userspace OSS emulation
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187706
------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-10-03 11:27 EST -------
(In reply to comment #13)
> Just a heads-up, I finished a new SRPM with most (all?) of the fixes rolled in:
>
> http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/alsa-oss/alsa-oss.spec
> http://beer.tclug.org/fedora-extras/alsa-oss/alsa-oss-1.0.12-1.fc6.src.rpm
>
> I've also noticed the the original reporter evidently hasn't been seen on
> Bugzilla since 2006-04-26, has three bugs filed against his packages, and has
> had his existing packages orphaned. In other words, I think he's gone. :-(
>
> *begins twiddling thumbs*
Given all of the above, I'd suggest raising a new review request right now so
that the new package can be "ready to go" on the 7th; this ticket can then be
closed as a duplicate of the new one at that time.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377
jima(a)beer.tclug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jima(a)beer.tclug.org
------- Additional Comments From jima(a)beer.tclug.org 2006-10-03 11:17 EST -------
This review appears to be stalled; consider this the one-week warning as
described here:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/Policy/StalledReviews
If Michel doesn't respond within one week, we can revert this review to FE-NEW
and another reviewer may take over.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.