[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583
------- Additional Comments From jeff(a)ocjtech.us 2006-11-08 10:25 EST -------
Oh, right, sorry... working on 3 hours of sleep right now... Mock does not add
any --defines or anything like that for building kernel modules. You'll need to
edit the spec file and manually add macro definitions like this:
%define kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6
%define kvariants ""
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583
------- Additional Comments From arechenberg(a)shermfin.com 2006-11-08 10:19 EST -------
Thanks Jeff.
I can build the zaptel-kmod package outside of mock just fine, so I think that
this problem is with kmodtool or mock or I just don't know how to use mock
correctly :)
If some kind soul could talk a look at the errors above and point me in the
right direction I would greatly appreciate it :)
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583
------- Additional Comments From jeff(a)ocjtech.us 2006-11-08 10:15 EST -------
There was a change in the kernel sometime after 2.6.17 that made zaptel not
compile anymore. The bug was fixed in the Zaptel SVN but I don't think that the
change has made its way into a released version. In any case, I'm not going to
be producing new zaptel-kmod packages because the decision was made to get
zaptel into the kernel package rather than as a separate RPM.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583
------- Additional Comments From arechenberg(a)shermfin.com 2006-11-08 09:45 EST -------
I can't get the zaptel-kmod.spec to build in mock on Fedora Core 6. If use the
following rpmbuild command to build outside of mock everything build fine:
rpmbuild -ba SPECS/zaptel-kmod.spec --define 'kernel 2.6.18-1.2798.fc6'
--define 'kvariants ""' --target i686
However, mock tries to rebuild the SRPM without the --define options and (I
assume) rpmbuild throws:
error: Package already exists: %package -n kmod-zaptel
If I run the same command that mock is running to build the SRPM:
rpmbuild -bs --target i686 --nodeps SPECS/zaptel-kmod.spec
I receive the same error. Does anyone have an idea as to whether this error is
a problem with the spec file, mock, rpmbuild or kmodtool?
Here are my package versions:
mock-0.6.8-4.fc6
rpm-build-4.4.2-32
rpmdevtools-5.3-1.fc6
kmodtool 0.10.11
Thanks,
Andy.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 214055] New: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several adventure games
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214055
Summary: Review Request: scummvm - Interpreter for several
adventure games
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: j.w.r.degoede(a)hhs.nl
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/scummvm.spec
SRPM URL: http://people.atrpms.net/~hdegoede/scummvm-0.9.1-1.fc7.src.rpm
Description:
ScummVM is an implementation of the SCUMM (Script Creation Utility for
Maniac Mansion) engine used in various Lucas Arts games such as Monkey
Island and Day of the Tentacle. At this time ScummVM should be considered
ALPHA software, as it's still under heavy development. Be aware that while
many games will work with few major bugs, crashes can happen. Also note
that saved games can, and probably will, be incompatible between releases.
Also ScummVM is capable of playing several non-SCUMM games.
---
As discussed on f-e-l, scummvm is moving from Livna to FE since there have been released two Free games for it. There is one downside to being in FE.
I've had to disable mp3 and mpeg2 video support. mp3 support is not a problem since scummvm also supports ogg and the involved media packs are available in both ogg and mp3 format. However the loose of mpeg2 video playback is unfortunate as that means that the cutscenes in the Broken Sword game cannot be
played. I believe this is a small disadvantage as it influences only one game and that the advantages of being in FE outway this disadvantage.
I'll request upstream to add theora support and to also provide theora versions of the involved media packs fixing this.
I'll also be submitting several game packages for scumm today and I'll add their bug numbers to this bug, so you will have something to test with when reviewing.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 187843] Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: phpMyAdmin - Web based MySQL browser written in php
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=187843
rdieter(a)math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From rdieter(a)math.unl.edu 2006-11-07 09:53 EST -------
OK, rest of the package is sane, pretty straight-forward and simple, rpmlint-clean.
MUSTFIX: Release tag must be of the form
0.1.<alpha|beta|rc>
I trust you'll fix that before importing, else I'll mark this APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
17 years, 6 months