November 2006 - package-review - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 ------- Additional Comments From colding(a)omesc.com 2006-11-09 08:57 EST ------- OK, it works now. Thanks, jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 214499] New: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214499 Summary: Review Request: multican - Remote control utility for Canon cameras Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: jnovy(a)redhat.com QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com CC: security-response-team(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/multican.spec SRPM URL: http://people.redhat.com/jnovy/files/multican-0.0.4-1.src.rpm Description: multican is Canon EOS class USB remote control utility for 400D, 300D, 350D, 30D, 20D and 5D. It is possible to control more of Canon cameras in the same time up to six cameras attached. Multican allows scripted remote control of multiple cameras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 7 months

1
6
0 / 0

[Bug 211726] New: Review Request: gcstar - Personal collections manager

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=211726 Summary: Review Request: gcstar - Personal collections manager Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: tian(a)c-sait.net QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://www.gcstar.org/fedora/gcstar.spec SRPM URL: http://www.gcstar.org/fedora/gcstar-0.5.0-1.src.rpm Description: GCstar is an application for managing your personal collections. Detailed information on each item can be automatically retrieved from the internet and you can store additional data, depending on the collection type. And also who you've lent your them to. You may also search and filter your collection by criteria. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 7 months

1
8
0 / 0

[Bug 212692] New package: libgnomekbd

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: New package: libgnomekbd https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=212692 colding(a)omesc.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |colding(a)omesc.com ------- Additional Comments From colding(a)omesc.com 2006-11-09 06:21 EST ------- Not sure if this is the right place, but todays yum update gave me: Transaction Check Error: file /etc/gconf/schemas/desktop_gnome_peripherals_keyboard_xkb.schemas from install of libgnomekbd-2.17.2-1.fc7 conflicts with file from package control-center-2.17.1-2.fc7 -- jules -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor]

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|NOTABUG |DUPLICATE ------- Additional Comments From cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu 2006-11-09 00:53 EST ------- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 214746 *** -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor]

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 ------- Additional Comments From paul(a)city-fan.org 2006-11-08 17:34 EST ------- The submitter made no response to the questions brought up during review of the package (Comment #23) and so the submission was eventually abandoned. This enables any other interested party to make their own submission if they would like to maintain the package in Extras. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 179758] Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor]

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: Eiciel (ACL editor) [Seeking Sponsor] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=179758 markg852(a)hotmail.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markg852(a)hotmail.com ------- Additional Comments From markg852(a)hotmail.com 2006-11-08 16:42 EST ------- Why isn`t this package in the Fedora Extras repo? it seems to work fine for me.. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 188014] Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188014 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163779 |201449 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 188014] Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: pam_otpw - One time password support for PAM https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188014 tmraz(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG ------- Additional Comments From tmraz(a)redhat.com 2006-11-08 13:55 EST ------- No action from reporter. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 177583] Review Request: zaptel-kmod

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: zaptel-kmod https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=177583 ------- Additional Comments From dwmw2(a)redhat.com 2006-11-08 10:29 EST ------- Unless you have Digium hardware, the right direction for now is probably OpenPBX. That's been fixed to use POSIX timers instead of relying on zaptel kernel code. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

17 years, 7 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review November 2006