package-review November 2006

package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org

1 participants
1033 discussions

[Bug 217524] New: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '06

28 Nov '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217524 Summary: Review Request: libsyncml - SyncML protocol library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fedora_extras(a)normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/libsyncml.spec SRPM URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/libsyncml-0.4… Description: Libsyncml is a implementation of the SyncML protocol. Quote from Wikipedia: "SyncML is most commonly thought of as a method to synchronize contact and calendar information between some type of handheld device and a computer (personal, or network-based service), such as between a mobile phone and a personal computer." Note 1: This library requires wbxml2, which has been unorphaned. See bug #217180. Note 2: I have not yet managed to build it with mock, because wbxml2 has not been pushed into rawhide. It was build successfully today. See http://buildsys.fedoraproject.org/build-status/job.psp?uid=22503 Note 3: libopensync-plugin-syncml will follow, blocked by bug #217150. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 5

[Bug 217180] New: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '06

28 Nov '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=217180 Summary: Review Request: wbxml2 - WBXML parser and compiler library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: laurent.rineau__fedora_extras(a)normalesup.org QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com Spec URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/wbxml2.spec SRPM URL: http://www-sop.inria.fr/geometrica/team/Laurent.Rineau/Fedora/wbxml2-0.9.2-… Description: The WBXML Library (libwbxml) contains a library and its associated tools to parse, encode and handle WBXML documents. The WBXML format is a binary representation of XML, defined by the Wap Forum, and used to reduce bandwidth in mobile communications. This library is a required by libsyncml (to be submitted latter). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 6

[Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '06

28 Nov '06

1 0

[Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '06

28 Nov '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-28 02:22 EST ------- Okay, I will review this package. 0. spec file description : * %prep - applying patches I usually recommend to add some suffix every time you apply a patch, e.g. %patch1 -p1 -b .am * %build section - export CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" This is not necessary because %configure macro sets this. - make %{?_smp_mflags} LIBTOOL="/usr/bin/libtool" Use macro. i.e. LIBTOOL="%{_bindir}/libtool" * %install section - Fix broken Shebangs (Please see "timestamp" section below for this). * %files section - COPYING Why does every subpackage have same COPYING file? Only for rpmlint issue? If so, please remove these as this rpmlint can be ignored. - *.st files Well, actually I first saw this utility so I don't quite know how to use this package, however, are these *.st really required for 'minimal' use of smalltalk? Or are these somewhat 'add-on' files for smalltalk? (The judgment as of what is 'minimal' use is up to you.) - /usr/share/gnu-smalltalk/unsupported/binary.c rpmlint complains about this file as 'devel-file-in-non-devel-package'. Would you explain why this file should be in main package? Then: 1. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines : * Timestamps This package contains lots of text files (mainly *.st files), so keeping timestamps is highly preferable because - it shows when the file is written by upstream or vendor (as you) - it may suggest whether vendor (you) have changed original content. So please keep timestamps for text files included. Then: A. Try: 'make DESTDIR=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT INSTALL="install -c -p" install' B. For "Fix broken Shebangs" section: B-1 check if this section is still needed. B-2 If so (i.e. this section is still needed), change the description of this section so that the files which are actually not needed to be fixed _WON'T_ change their timestamps. * File and Directory Ownership - %{_datadir}/aclocal/ This directory is owned only by automake and so -devel package should require automake. 2. From http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines : (okay) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '06

28 Nov '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163778 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
by Red Hat Bugzilla 28 Nov '06

28 Nov '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=174377 mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

[Bug 174377] Review Request: gnu-smalltalk - GNU Smalltalk
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Nov '06

27 Nov '06

1 0

[Bug 217278] New: Review Request: tcd-utils - TCD (Tide Constituent Database) Utils
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Nov '06

27 Nov '06

1 9

[Bug 217277] New: Review Request: libtcd - Tide Constituent Database Library
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Nov '06

27 Nov '06

1 8

[Bug 185535] Review Request: lurker
by Red Hat Bugzilla 27 Nov '06

27 Nov '06

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: lurker https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=185535 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2006-11-27 02:39 EST ------- Well, what is the current status of this review request? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

1 0

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

package-review November 2006