Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mod_auth_ntlm_winbind - NTLM authentication for the Apache web server using winbind daemon
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=188138
rdieter(a)math.unl.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info |nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193446
Summary: Review Request: <main package name here>
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink(a)leemhuis.info
ReportedBy: madcat(a)mymadcat.com
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://mymadcat.com/gliv.spec
SRPM URL: http://mymadcat.com/gliv.src.rpm
Description: GLiv is an OpenGL image viewer. GLiv is very fast and smooth at rotating,
panning and zooming if you have an OpenGL accelerated graphics board.
The spec file is took from dag, the package does not seem to be maintained anymore... I spoke to the author, who is ok for gliv to enter fedora extras.
This is my first package for fedora extras, so I seek a sponsor.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215564
Summary: Review Request: bdock - Beryl project's replacement
windowmaker dock
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jwilson(a)redhat.com
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/bdock.spec
SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/bdock-0.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm
Description:
Beryl is a combined window manager and compositing
manager that runs on top of Xgl or AIGLX using OpenGL
to provide effects accelerated by a 3D graphics card
on the desktop. Beryl is a community-driven fork of
Compiz.
Bdock is a replacement for the windowmaker dock.
Depends on beryl-core, submitted for FE-review under bug 209259.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=215571
Summary: Review Request: heliodor - Beryl window decorator with
Metacity theme support
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: jwilson(a)redhat.com
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor.spec
SRPM URL: http://wilsonet.com/packages/beryl/heliodor-0.1.2-1.fc6.src.rpm
Description:
Beryl is a combined window manager and compositing
manager that runs on top of Xgl or AIGLX using OpenGL
to provide effects accelerated by a 3D graphics card
on the desktop. Beryl is a community-driven fork of
Compiz.
Heliodor is a gtk-window-decorator for use with beryl
that supports using Metacity themes.
Depends on beryl-core, submitted for FE-review under bug 209259.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=216282
Summary: Review Request: mirage - A fast and simple image viewer
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: Package Review
AssignedTo: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
ReportedBy: mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp
QAContact: fedora-package-review(a)redhat.com
Spec URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SPECS/mirag…
SRPM URL: http://www.ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp/~mtasaka/dist/extras/development/SRPMS/mirag…
Description:
Mirage is a fast and simple GTK+ image viewer. Because it
depends only on PyGTK, Mirage is ideal for users who wish to
keep their computers lean while still having a clean image viewer.
-----------------------------------------------
NOTE:
The original review request is bug 196570 , which is stalled.
However, I could not download the original spec file from the
bug so I rewrote the spec file fully by myself.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: mpich2 - An implementation of MPI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=171993
------- Additional Comments From rpm(a)greysector.net 2006-11-20 22:56 EST -------
Builds fine in mock devel/x86_64.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: NRPE - Monitoring agent for Nagios
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=180092
------- Additional Comments From dennis(a)ausil.us 2006-11-19 22:14 EST -------
package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
dist tag is present.
build root is correct.
%{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n)
license field matches the actual license.
license is open source-compatible. GPL License text is not included in
package.
source files match upstream:
22afa197db8e4e5b13fac48636917b6d ../SOURCES/nrpe-2.5.2.tar.gz
22afa197db8e4e5b13fac48636917b6d nrpe-2.5.2.tar.gz
latest version is being packaged.
BuildRequires are proper.
package builds in mock ( fc5,fc6,devel on x86_64 and i386 ).
rpmlint is silent.
final provides and requires are sane:
nagios-plugins-nrpe-2.5.2-3.fc6.x86_64.rpm
check_nrpe
nagios-plugins-nrpe = 2.5.2-3.fc6
libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
libnsl.so.1()(64bit)
libssl.so.6()(64bit)
nagios-plugins
nrpe-2.5.2-3.fc6.x86_64.rpm
config(nrpe) = 2.5.2-3.fc6
nrpe = 2.5.2-3.fc6
/sbin/chkconfig
/sbin/service
/usr/sbin/useradd
config(nrpe) = 2.5.2-3.fc6
libcrypto.so.6()(64bit)
libnsl.so.1()(64bit)
libssl.so.6()(64bit)
libwrap.so.0()(64bit)
no shared libraries are present.
package is not relocatable.
owns the directories it creates.
doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
no duplicates in %files.
file permissions are appropriate.
%clean is present.
code, not content.
documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary.
%docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
no headers.
no pkgconfig files.
no libtool .la droppings.
not a GUI app.
not a web app.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.