Product: Fedora
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=894338
--- Comment #3 from Ramon de C Valle <rcvalle(a)redhat.com> ---
Actually not, because my files section was (*.so, and not *.so.*):
%files
%doc
%{_libdir}/*.so
(In reply to comment #2)
> [!]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage,
if present.
> Note: Unversioned so-files directly in %_libdir.
Did you notice that the main package would be empty then?
Please always verify what fedora-review reports.
The src.rpm needs a lot of work.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Unsubscribe from this bug
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/token.cgi?t=QYHgSRKXB8&a=cc_unsubscribe