https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731
--- Comment #138 from Oleg Girko <ol+redhat(a)infoserver.lv> ---
(In reply to Warren Togami from comment #137)
1) "bitcoin-core" is not a good main package name because
it looks like
"core" is a subpackage. "bitcoincore" would be a fine single word
name that
matches its website
bitcoincore.org.
It won't look like a subpackage because it's just SRPM package name, but none
of RPM packages built from it will be called "bitcoin-core".
However, from aesthetic point of view, I think, it would be nicer is RPM
packages would be called "bitcoin-server", "bitcoin-utils" etc.
instead of
"bitcoin-core-server", "bitcoin-core-utils" etc.
I use similar approach in my Dash package: SRPM is called "dash-core" (to avoid
a conflict with "dash" package that is a shell), but RPMS built from it are
called "dash-server", "dash-utils" etc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1834731