https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1650987
Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #18 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com> ---
(In reply to Alain V. from comment #16)
Thank you so much Fabio for the review/advises.
I understand Fedora policy, to not include .a archive libs. I list only 7
such files on my system...
$ ls -1 /usr/lib64/*.a|wc -l
7
Yeah, and those 7 probably shouldn't be there either.
To simplify the situation, I propose to drop the static sub-package
and
such, I patched even more the Makefile :
Spec URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/avigne/libgenht/fedora-
rawhide-x86_64/00832049-libgenht/libgenht.spec
SRPM URL:
https://copr-be.cloud.fedoraproject.org/results/avigne/libgenht/fedora-
rawhide-x86_64/00832049-libgenht/libgenht-1.0.1-3.fc30.src.rpm
The mageia-cauldron is failing again, and looking at root.log.gz, I don't
see the reason why.
Somebody should report something somewhere ?
It's a known issue in mock / COPR, I think - failed downloads due to network
issues aren't retried.
Concerning -Wl,-soname,$(LIBSO) , upstream Makefile will NOT include
this
statement, as it is a gcc flag only, and upstream is "compiler agnostic".
I don't think that's true, since the "-Wl," flag only passes through
the
following arguments to the linker. But alright, if upstream doesn't want to add
it, keep the flag in your patch for the Makefile.
I hope what I propose makes sense ?
Alain
Yes, it does, the package looks good now!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component