https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1427341
--- Comment #45 from Charalampos Stratakis <cstratak(a)redhat.com> ---
Hello Vincent and thanks for your work and your patience with the package
review.
Technically all seems fine now. The package builds and works as expected.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
Just one last item on the list. Please add a comment above the license tag with
a small explanation of the licenses breakdown [0]. Also please mention there
that the CC-BY-SA is for the documentation subpackage that hasn't been
built/shipped yet.
[!]: If the package is under multiple licenses, the licensing breakdown
must be documented in the spec.
[0]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines?rd=Packaging...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component