Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: bugzilla-sink@leemhuis.info ReportedBy: thomas@apestaart.org QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: https://apestaart.org/thomas/trac/browser/pkg/fedora.extras/redland-bindings... SRPM URL: http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/redland-bindin... Description: Redland is a library that provides a high-level interface for RDF (Resource Description Framework) implemented in an object-based API. It is modular and supports different RDF/XML parsers, storage mechanisms and other elements. Redland is designed for applications developers to provide RDF support in their applications as well as for RDF developers to experiment with the technology.
This module adds bindings for perl, python and ruby
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
------- Additional Comments From thomas@apestaart.org 2006-06-17 15:24 EST ------- Due to review of rasqal, I've made some additional changes to this package.
New src.rpm up at http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/redland-bindin...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
------- Additional Comments From thomas@apestaart.org 2007-02-03 17:20 EST ------- http://thomas.apestaart.org/download/pkg/fedora-5-i386-extras/redland-1.0.4-...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
------- Additional Comments From thomas@apestaart.org 2007-02-03 17:34 EST ------- sorry, that was supposed to go in the other bug report :)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776 | nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2007-07-28 12:22 EST ------- This has been sitting around for a really long time; is there anything that's stopping it from being reviewed? I assume it needs redland; is that done now?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO Flag| |needinfo?(thomas@apestaart.o | |rg)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2007-11-03 14:33 EST ------- There's been no response for months now, and it's been in needinfo for over a month. I will close this ticket soon if there's no response.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
------- Additional Comments From dmalcolm@redhat.com 2007-11-12 17:08 EST ------- redland is in FC-6, F-7 onwards in CVS at least, FWIW
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: redland-bindings - bindings for the redland RDF library
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- BugsThisDependsOn| |201449 Status|NEEDINFO |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(thomas@apestaart.o| |rg) |
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2007-11-18 20:45 EST ------- It's been another two weeks with no response; closing.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
Kevin Kofler kevin@tigcc.ticalc.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |201449 Depends on|201449 |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
Thomas Vander Stichele thomas@apestaart.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |Reopened Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|NOTABUG |
--- Comment #9 from Thomas Vander Stichele thomas@apestaart.org 2008-11-09 11:41:11 EDT --- So what should I do if I actually want to get this reviewed ?
It seems it's just a structural problem of not being able to get reviewers for certain kinds of packages, which is a shame.
I'll reopen jsut so it gets on someone's radar and someone can tell me what my options are if I want this reviewed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@math.uh.edu Blocks|201449 |
--- Comment #10 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-11-10 11:36:29 EDT --- I don't understand how you see this as a structural problem; I was here and willing to review this package, but you failed to respond.
If you want a review now, a good place to start would be to make sure the package still builds and to release any updates that are necessary.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
Till Maas opensource@till.name changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |opensource@till.name Flag| |needinfo?(thomas@apestaart. | |org)
--- Comment #11 from Till Maas opensource@till.name 2008-12-10 07:45:37 EDT --- There is a newer version of the package available, please update and notice comment:10 to get this reviewed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
--- Comment #12 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-12-10 11:47:59 EDT --- Yes, this ticket is coming around to being closed, again, due to submitter inaction.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=195678
Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Blocks| |201449 Resolution| |NOTABUG Flag|needinfo?(thomas@apestaart. | |org) |
--- Comment #13 from Jason Tibbitts tibbs@math.uh.edu 2008-12-16 18:30:53 EDT --- Looks like nothing's going to happen here. Well, we tried.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org