Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Review Request: Amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Summary: Review Request: Amide - A Medical Image Data Examiner: Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: notting@redhat.com, fedora-package-review@redhat.com Estimated Hours: 0.0 Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: http://susmit.fedorapeople.org/packaging/amide/amide.spec SRPM URL: http://susmit.fedorapeople.org/packaging/amide/amide-0.9.2-1.fc14.src.rpm Description: Amide's a Medical Image Data Examiner: Amide is a tool for viewing, registering, and analyzing anatomical and functional volumetric medical imaging data sets.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #1 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-01-02 11:50:01 EST --- Note: Contact upstream about the patch.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |673841(fedora-medical)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |cwickert@fedoraproject.org
--- Comment #2 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-30 16:19:00 EST --- The package build-requires ffmpeg-devel, so there is no chance to have it in Fedora. Let's see if we can build it without ffmpeg.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody@fedoraproject.org |cwickert@fedoraproject.org
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #3 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-30 18:44:47 EST --- Live from FUDCon Tempe here are new packages with a ton of review fixes:
SRPM: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/amide-0.9.2-2.fc15.src.rpm SPEC: http://cwickert.fedorapeople.org/review/amide.spec
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #4 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2011-01-30 18:47:19 EST --- OK - MUST: pmlint /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/result/amide-* 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. OK - MUST: named according to the Package Naming Guidelines OK - MUST: spec file name matches the base package %{name} OK - MUST: package meets the Packaging Guidelines OK - MUST: Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines OK - MUST: License field in spec file matches the actual license: GPLv2+ OK - MUST: license file included in %doc OK - MUST: spec is in American English OK - MUST: spec is legible OK - MUST: sources match the upstream source by MD5 0d40364f35011fd8a1a2e87512aceb1d OK - MUST: successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on x86_64 N/A - MUST: If the package does not successfully compile, build or work on an architecture, then those architectures should be listed in the spec in ExcludeArch. OK - MUST: all build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. OK - MUST: handles locales properly with %find_lang N/A - MUST: Every binary RPM package (or subpackage) which stores shared library files (not just symlinks) in any of the dynamic linker's default paths, must call ldconfig in %post and %postun. OK - MUST: Package does not bundle copies of system libraries. N/A - MUST: If the package is designed to be relocatable, the packager must state this fact in the request for review, along with the rationalization for relocation of that specific package. OK - MUST: owns all directories that it creates OK - MUST: no duplicate files in the %files listing OK - MUST: Permissions on files are set properly, includes %defattr(...) OK - MUST: consistently uses macros OK - MUST: package contains code, or permissable content N/A - MUST: Large documentation files should go in a -doc subpackage OK- MUST: Files included as %doc do not affect the runtime of the application N/A - MUST: Header files must be in a -devel package N/A - MUST: Static libraries must be in a -static package N/A - MUST: library files that end in .so are in the -devel package. OK - MUST: devel packages must require the base package using a fully versioned dependency OK - MUST: The package does not contain any .la libtool archives. OK - MUST: The package contains a GUI application and includes a %{name}.desktop file, and that file is properly installed with desktop-file-install in the %install section. OK - MUST: package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. OK - Should: at the beginning of %install, the package runs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT OK - MUST: all filenames valid UTF-8
SHOULD Items: OK - SHOULD: Source package includes license text(s) as a separate file. OK - SHOULD: The description and summary sections in the package spec file should contain translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. OK - SHOULD: builds in mock. OK - SHOULD: compiles and builds into binary rpms on all supported architectures. OK - SHOULD: functions as described. N/A - SHOULD: Scriptlets are sane. N/A - SHOULD: Usually, subpackages other than devel should require the base package using a fully versioned dependency. N/A - SHOULD: pkgconfig(.pc) files should be placed in a -devel pkg OK - SHOULD: no file dependencies outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, or /usr/sbin OK - SHOULD: package should contain man pages for binaries/scripts.
Other items: OK - latest stable version OK - SourceURL valid OK - Compiler flags ok OK - Debuginfo complete OK - SHOULD: package has a %clean section, which contains rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT N/A - SHOULD: Packages containing pkgconfig(.pc) files must 'Requires: pkgconfig'.
APPROVED!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #5 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-01-30 18:48:06 EST --- Great, Thanks a lot Christoph.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
--- Comment #6 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-02-01 12:44:52 EST --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: amide Short Description: A Medical Image Data Examiner Owners: Susmit Branches: f14 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #7 from Bill Nottingham notting@redhat.com 2011-02-02 17:34:56 EST --- Please fix the package owner to match the FAS account name.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #8 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-02-02 17:41:00 EST --- My user name *is* susmit, is it case sensitive?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #9 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-02-02 17:41:11 EST --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: amide Short Description: A Medical Image Data Examiner Owners: susmit Branches: f14 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #10 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2011-02-02 17:44:33 EST --- (In reply to comment #8)
My user name *is* susmit, is it case sensitive?
Yes.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #11 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2011-02-03 15:22:34 EST --- Also, is the package amide or Amide? The summary and the package name don't match. ;(
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: Amide - A |Review Request: amide - A |Medical Image Data |Medical Image Data |Examiner: |Examiner:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #12 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-02-03 15:37:45 EST --- I have updated the wiki with the information. It was no where mentioned in the wiki that these fields are case sensitive.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #13 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-02-03 15:37:58 EST --- New Package SCM Request ======================= Package Name: amide Short Description: A Medical Image Data Examiner Owners: susmit Branches: f14 InitialCC:
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #14 from Kevin Fenzi kevin@tummy.com 2011-02-06 17:50:41 EST --- Git done (by process-git-requests).
Sorry on the case sensitive fields.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed| |2011-02-06 21:45:31
--- Comment #15 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-02-06 21:45:31 EST --- Thank you very much. It has been pushed to koji. CLosing as NEXTRELEASE.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Andreas Loening loening@alum.mit.edu changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED CC| |loening@alum.mit.edu Resolution|NEXTRELEASE | Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #16 from Andreas Loening loening@alum.mit.edu 2011-02-08 00:14:11 EST --- Hi Susmit,
Sorry, but I would prefer if you did not push this into Fedora at the current time.
AMIDE is dependent on both the dcmtk and xmedcon libraries that are not currently in Fedora. Even though you can build amide without these libraries, it's close to useless without these libraries. It'd be like distributing a version of GIMP that couldn't read/write jpeg, png, or tiff. This is not the user experience that I want people to have with this application. I've been holding off on submitting this package myself for that very reason.
There's ongoing work to get DCMTK properly packaged for Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910
If somebody wants to take on packaging xmedcon (http://xmedcon.sf.net), that'd also be useful.
Andy
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #17 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-02-27 23:21:19 EST --- Retired for time being. Will take up again once xmedcon and DCMTK is packaged.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lemenkov@gmail.com Depends on| |573910(dcmtk)
--- Comment #18 from Peter Lemenkov lemenkov@gmail.com 2011-04-22 04:00:25 EDT --- DCMTK is available in Fedora finally, so it's time to continue.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #19 from Susmit thinklinux.ssh@gmail.com 2011-04-22 23:37:54 EDT --- Thanks for the heads up, but xmedcon is still not. I am not sure is that would be useful without it. Andy?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |sanjay.ankur@gmail.com Alias| |amide
Bug 666726 depends on bug 573910, which changed state.
Bug 573910 Summary: Review Request: dcmtk - Offis DICOM Toolkit https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=573910
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution| |ERRATA Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Depends on| |714328(xmedcon)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #20 from Andreas Loening loening@alum.mit.edu 2011-06-18 18:09:19 EDT --- Hey Susmit. I think getting AMIDE into Fedora should still wait on getting xmedcon into Fedora. Till then, people can just download the rpm package directly off the AMIDE website.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Bug 666726 depends on bug 714328, which changed state.
Bug 714328 Summary: Review Request: xmedcon - A medical image conversion utility and library https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=714328
What |Old Value |New Value ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #21 from Ankur Sinha sanjay.ankur@gmail.com 2011-08-10 13:51:17 EDT --- Hello,
xmedcon has been packaged in fedora. Susmit, would you continue with this package? If you don't want to, please close this ticket. I shall open a fresh ticket.
Thanks, Ankur
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #22 from Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org 2011-08-26 05:45:11 EDT --- I have built amide with xmedcon and dcmtk now, see http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3302474
Ankur, please push xmedcon to F14-F15 updates released so I can build the other releases and then close this bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #23 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-06 18:57:14 EDT --- amide-0.9.2-4.fc14 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 14. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/amide-0.9.2-4.fc14
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #24 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-06 18:57:27 EDT --- amide-0.9.2-4.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/amide-0.9.2-4.fc16
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
--- Comment #25 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-06 18:58:26 EDT --- amide-0.9.2-4.fc15 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 15. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/amide-0.9.2-4.fc15
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Christoph Wickert cwickert@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|MODIFIED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE Last Closed|2011-02-06 21:45:31 |2011-10-06 18:59:57
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version| |amide-1.0.0-1.fc16 Resolution|NEXTRELEASE |ERRATA
--- Comment #26 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-19 00:28:06 EDT --- amide-1.0.0-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|amide-1.0.0-1.fc16 |amide-1.0.0-1.fc15
--- Comment #27 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-20 05:56:22 EDT --- amide-1.0.0-1.fc15 has been pushed to the Fedora 15 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=666726
Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed In Version|amide-1.0.0-1.fc15 |amide-1.0.0-1.fc14
--- Comment #28 from Fedora Update System updates@fedoraproject.org 2011-10-20 06:00:01 EDT --- amide-1.0.0-1.fc14 has been pushed to the Fedora 14 stable repository.
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org