https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424721
--- Comment #4 from Randy Barlow <randy(a)electronsweatshop.com> ---
(In reply to Remi Collet from comment #3)
[!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
From PHP Guildelines
A PSR-4 [2] compliant library would put its PHP files in
/usr/share/php/<Vendor Name> in a PSR-0 compliant tree.
So should be /usr/share/php/ZipStream
Hello Remi!
Oh I didn't realize that the string "ZipStream" inside the
composer.json's psr
section was a clue about where the package should be installed. I assumed that
the vendor from packagist should be used. Now I understand better, thanks! I've
opted to go with ZipStream as you suggested above. If we hit a conflict later,
we can fix it at that time I believe.
[!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
From composer.json
"require": {
"php": ">= 5.6",
"ext-mbstring": "*"
},
From phpcompatinfo report
Requires PHP 5.3.0 (min), PHP 5.3.0 (all)
This usually means upstream don't want to support EOL PHP version.
=> packager choise
Do you need it in EPEL ? (build ok en epel-6 and epel-7)
I've updated it to be 5.6 to reflect upstream's wishes. I don't plan to put
Ampache into EPEL 6 or 7 at this time, so this package doesn't need to go there
either (but I'm willing to add it later if requested).
Tips:
--bootstrap is not needed when the value in already defined in phpunit.xml
--no-coverage avoid the "Error: No code coverage driver is available" (but
requires phpunit > 4)
I've made both of these changes as well. New files here:
Spec URL:
https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/php-maennchen-zipstream-php.spec
SRPM URL:
https://bowlofeggs.fedorapeople.org/php-maennchen-zipstream-php-0.4.1-2.f...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component