[Bug 1424798] New: Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

            Bug ID: 1424798
           Summary: Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE,
                    backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)
           Product: Fedora
           Version: rawhide
         Component: Package Review
          Severity: medium
          Priority: medium
          Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
          Reporter: besser82(a)fedoraproject.org
        QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
                CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org



Description:

  Xed is a small, but powerful text editor.  It has most standard text
  editor functions and fully supports international text in Unicode.
  Advanced features include syntax highlighting and automatic indentation
  of source code, printing and editing of multiple documents in one window.

  Xed is extensible through a plugin system, which currently includes
  support for spell checking, comparing files, viewing CVS ChangeLogs, and
  adjusting indentation levels.


Koji Build:

  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=17955068


Issues:

  No known issues.  Some minor complains from rpmlint.


FAS-User:

  besser82


Urls:

  Spec URL:  https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/xed.spec
  SRPM URL: 
https://besser82.fedorapeople.org/review/xed-1.2.2-0.1.fc26.src.rpm


Thanks for review in advance!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Alias|                            |xed



--- Comment #1 from Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
Moved files to pagure-repo:

Urls:

  Spec URL:  https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/xed.spec
  SRPM URL: 
https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/xed-1.2.2-0.1.fc26...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Blocks|                            |1359390




Referenced Bugs:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1359390
[Bug 1359390] Cinnamon X-apps
-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.co
                   |                            |m



--- Comment #2 from Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
*** Bug 1358699 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #3 from Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
Updated package:

Urls:

  Spec URL:  https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/xed.spec
  SRPM URL: 
https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/xed-1.2.2-0.2.fc26...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org    |leigh123linux(a)googlemail.co
                   |                            |m



--- Comment #4 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com&gt; ---
You can remove  these as gnome-common requires them

BuildRequires:    autoconf
BuildRequires:    automake
BuildRequires:    gettext

The package requires gschema scriptlets

%{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas/org.x.editor.*gschema.xml


You also have a directory ownership issue on

%{_datadir}/help

change it to 


%{_datadir}/help/*/%{name}/


Do we really need the debian bits?

%license AUTHORS COPYING debian/copyright
%doc ChangeLog README debian/changelog

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #5 from Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
(In reply to leigh scott from comment #4)
>  You can remove  these as gnome-common requires them
>  
>  BuildRequires:    autoconf
>  BuildRequires:    automake
>  BuildRequires:    gettext
>  
>  The package requires gschema scriptlets
>  
>  %{_datadir}/glib-2.0/schemas/org.x.editor.*gschema.xml
>  
>  
>  You also have a directory ownership issue on
>  
>  %{_datadir}/help
>  
>  change it to 
>  
>  
>  %{_datadir}/help/*/%{name}/
>  
>  
>  Do we really need the debian bits?
>  
>  %license AUTHORS COPYING debian/copyright
>  %doc ChangeLog README debian/changelog 
See:  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424825#c5

***

Updated package:

Urls:

  Spec URL:  https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/xed.spec
  SRPM URL: 
https://pagure.io/besser82/package-review/raw/master/f/xed-1.2.2-0.3.fc26...

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
              Flags|                            |fedora-review+



--- Comment #6 from leigh scott <leigh123linux(a)googlemail.com&gt; ---
Approved

Please fix the ownership issue on

%doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc

change it to 

%doc %{_datadir}/gtk-doc/html/%{name}

when you import it


Package Review
==============

Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
[ ] = Manual review needed


Issues:
=======
- glib-compile-schemas is run in %postun and %posttrans if package has
  *.gschema.xml files.
  Note: gschema file(s) in xed
  See:
  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GSettings_Schema
- update-desktop-database is invoked in %post and %postun if package
  contains desktop file(s) with a MimeType: entry.
  Note: desktop file(s) with MimeType entry in xed
  See: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#desktop-
  database


===== MUST items =====

C/C++:
[-]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[-]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present.
     Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see
     attachment). Verify they are not in ld path.
[x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.

Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
     other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
     Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
     Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
     found: "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or later) (with incorrect FSF
     address)", "LGPL (v2 or later)", "GPL (v2 or later)",
"*No copyright*
     GPL (v2)", "Unknown or generated", "*No copyright* GPL (v2 or
later)".
     264 files have unknown license. Detailed output of licensecheck in
     /home/leigh/Desktop/1424798-xed/licensecheck.txt
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
     Note: No known owner of /usr/share/help/ar, /usr/share/help/th
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
     Note: Directories without known owners: /usr/share/help/fi,
     /usr/share/help/uk, /usr/share/help/de, /usr/share/help/da,
     /usr/share/help/sv, /usr/share/help/hu, /usr/share/help/fr,
     /usr/share/help/C, /usr/share/help/zh_HK, /usr/share/help/ja,
     /usr/share/help/es, /usr/share/help/cs, /usr/share/help/ar,
     /usr/share/help/ca, /usr/share/help/el, /usr/share/help/zh_CN,
     /usr/share/help/pt_BR, /usr/share/help/oc, /usr/share/help/it,
     /usr/share/help/th, /usr/share/help/zh_TW, /usr/share/help/ko,
     /usr/share/help/bg, /usr/share/help/ru
[!]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
     Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: /usr/share/gtk-doc(gnome-
     desktop3-devel, libgnome-keyring-devel, libsecret-devel, gcr-devel,
     polkit-docs, p11-kit-devel, libpeas-devel, harfbuzz-devel,
     libcanberra-devel, json-glib-devel, clutter-gst3-devel, libgdata-
     devel, gnome-bluetooth-libs-devel, gtk-doc), /usr/share/gtk-doc/html
     (gnome-desktop3-devel, libgnome-keyring-devel, libsecret-devel, gcr-
     devel, polkit-docs, p11-kit-devel, libpeas-devel, harfbuzz-devel,
     libcanberra-devel, json-glib-devel, clutter-gst3-devel, libgdata-
     devel, gnome-bluetooth-libs-devel, gtk-doc)
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[x]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: The spec file handles locales properly.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
     names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
     Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
[?]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
     (~1MB) or number of files.
     Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 3 files.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
     one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
     license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
     license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any
     that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
     beginning of %install.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[x]: Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or
     desktop-file-validate if there is such a file.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
     work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
     provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
     %{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local

===== SHOULD items =====

Generic:
[?] If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
     file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
     Note: No Requires: %{name}%{?_isa} = %{version}-%{release} in xed-
     devel , xed-doc , xed-debuginfo
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains
     translations for supported Non-English languages, if available.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
     architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[?]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
     files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
     $RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: The placement of pkgconfig(.pc) files are correct.
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.

===== EXTRA items =====

Generic:
[!]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
     is arched.
     Note: Arch-ed rpms have a total of 10782720 bytes in /usr/share
     xed-1.2.2-0.3.fc26.x86_64.rpm:10782720
     See:
    
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines#Package_Review_G...

It make no sense to me to do this so I am ignoring it!

[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
     Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.


Rpmlint
-------
Checking: xed-1.2.2-0.3.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          xed-devel-1.2.2-0.3.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          xed-doc-1.2.2-0.3.fc26.noarch.rpm
          xed-debuginfo-1.2.2-0.3.fc26.x86_64.rpm
          xed-1.2.2-0.3.fc26.src.rpm
xed-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
xed-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-close-confirmation-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-close-confirmation-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-encodings-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-encodings-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-preferences-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-preferences-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/xed-searchbar.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/xed-searchbar.h
xed.src:80: W: mixed-use-of-spaces-and-tabs (spaces: line 80, tab: line 1)
5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 11 warnings.




Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: xed-debuginfo-1.2.2-0.3.fc26.x86_64.rpm
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-close-confirmation-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-close-confirmation-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-encodings-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-encodings-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-preferences-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-preferences-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/xed-searchbar.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/xed-searchbar.h
1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 8 warnings.





Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
sh: /usr/bin/python: No such file or directory
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-close-confirmation-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-close-confirmation-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-encodings-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-encodings-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-preferences-dialog.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/dialogs/xed-preferences-dialog.h
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/xed-searchbar.c
xed-debuginfo.x86_64: W: spurious-executable-perm
/usr/src/debug/xed-1.2.2/xed/xed-searchbar.h
xed-devel.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
xed-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 10 warnings.



Requires
--------
xed (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /bin/sh
    libICE.so.6()(64bit)
    libSM.so.6()(64bit)
    libX11.so.6()(64bit)
    libatk-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libc.so.6()(64bit)
    libcairo-gobject.so.2()(64bit)
    libcairo.so.2()(64bit)
    libdl.so.2()(64bit)
    libenchant.so.1()(64bit)
    libfontconfig.so.1()(64bit)
    libfreetype.so.6()(64bit)
    libgdk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgio-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgmodule-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgobject-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgthread-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-3.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtk-x11-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtksourceview-2.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libgtksourceview-3.0.so.1()(64bit)
    libm.so.6()(64bit)
    libpango-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpangocairo-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpangoft2-1.0.so.0()(64bit)
    libpthread.so.0()(64bit)
    libpython2.7.so.1.0()(64bit)
    libutil.so.1()(64bit)
    libxml2.so.2()(64bit)
    libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.4.30)(64bit)
    libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.5.0)(64bit)
    libxml2.so.2(LIBXML2_2.6.0)(64bit)
    rtld(GNU_HASH)

xed-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

xed-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):

xed-devel (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
    /usr/bin/pkg-config
    xed(x86-64)



Provides
--------
xed:
    appdata()
    appdata(xed.appdata.xml)
    application()
    application(xed.desktop)
    libchangecase.so()(64bit)
    libcloader.so()(64bit)
    libdocinfo.so()(64bit)
    libfilebrowser.so()(64bit)
    libmodelines.so()(64bit)
    libpythonloader.so()(64bit)
    libsort.so()(64bit)
    libspell.so()(64bit)
    libtaglist.so()(64bit)
    libtime.so()(64bit)
    libtrailsave.so()(64bit)
    mimehandler(text/plain)
    xed
    xed(x86-64)

xed-doc:
    xed-doc

xed-debuginfo:
    xed-debuginfo
    xed-debuginfo(x86-64)

xed-devel:
    xed-devel
    xed-devel(x86-64)



Unversioned so-files
--------------------
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugin-loaders/libcloader.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugin-loaders/libpythonloader.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libchangecase.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libdocinfo.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libfilebrowser.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libmodelines.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libsort.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libspell.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libtaglist.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libtime.so
xed: /usr/lib64/xed/plugins/libtrailsave.so

Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/linuxmint/xed/archive/1.2.2.tar.gz#/xed-1.2.2.tar.gz :
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package     :
bfd040160ab57540b3828451d8e83356f4e5a345d8113e6427806d1cf69c4eae
  CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
bfd040160ab57540b3828451d8e83356f4e5a345d8113e6427806d1cf69c4eae


Generated by fedora-review 0.6.1 (f03e4e7) last change: 2016-05-02
Command line :/usr/bin/fedora-review -b 1424798
Buildroot used: fedora-rawhide-x86_64
Active plugins: Generic, Shell-api, C/C++
Disabled plugins: Java, Python, fonts, SugarActivity, Ocaml, Perl, Haskell, R,
PHP
Disabled flags: EXARCH, DISTTAG, EPEL5, BATCH, EPEL6

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #7 from Mario Blättermann <mario.blaettermann(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Release:    0.3%{?dist}

What's the reason to use such a construction for the release number? I can't
found anything in the guidelines [1] which applies to that.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |POST



--- Comment #8 from Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
Thank you for the review!  =)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #9 from Björn "besser82" Esser <besser82(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
---
(In reply to Mario Blättermann from comment #7)
>  Release:	0.3%{?dist}
>  
>  What's the reason to use such a construction for the release number? I can't
>  found anything in the guidelines [1] which applies to that.
>  
>  [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:DistTag 
I usually use 0.XY releases during review and bump to regular release-schema on
scm-import.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #10 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com&gt; ---
Package request has been approved:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/xed

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #11 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
xed-1.2.2-1.fc25 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 25.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3149a3b8d0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|POST                        |MODIFIED



-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
xed-1.2.2-1.fc24 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 24.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-72f325ca2a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|MODIFIED                    |ON_QA



--- Comment #13 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
xed-1.2.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-72f325ca2a

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
xed-1.2.2-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 testing repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.
See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for
instructions on how to install test updates.
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2017-3149a3b8d0

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798

Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|ON_QA                       |CLOSED
         Resolution|---                         |ERRATA
        Last Closed|                            |2017-03-02 22:49:51



--- Comment #15 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
xed-1.2.2-1.fc24 has been pushed to the Fedora 24 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component

[Bug 1424798] Review Request: xed - X-Apps [Text] Editor (Cross-DE, backward-compatible, GTK3, traditional UI)

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1424798



--- Comment #16 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; ---
xed-1.2.2-1.fc25 has been pushed to the Fedora 25 stable repository. If
problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component