[Bug 461383] New: Data::Visitor 0.19 is out
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Data::Visitor 0.19 is out
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461383
Summary: Data::Visitor 0.19 is out
Product: Fedora
Version: 9
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-Data-Visitor
AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Estimated Hours: 0.0
Classification: Fedora
...let's see if we can get it in before F-10 :-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
rpms/perl-Class-MOP/devel .cvsignore, 1.19, 1.20 perl-Class-MOP.spec, 1.23, 1.24 sources, 1.19, 1.20
by Chris Weyl
Author: cweyl
Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Class-MOP/devel
In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv13856
Modified Files:
.cvsignore perl-Class-MOP.spec sources
Log Message:
* Sat Dec 06 2008 Chris Weyl <cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu> 0.71-1
- update to 0.71
Index: .cvsignore
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Class-MOP/devel/.cvsignore,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.19 -r1.20
--- .cvsignore 15 Nov 2008 04:38:27 -0000 1.19
+++ .cvsignore 7 Dec 2008 04:25:54 -0000 1.20
@@ -1 +1 @@
-Class-MOP-0.70.tar.gz
+Class-MOP-0.71.tar.gz
Index: perl-Class-MOP.spec
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Class-MOP/devel/perl-Class-MOP.spec,v
retrieving revision 1.23
retrieving revision 1.24
diff -u -r1.23 -r1.24
--- perl-Class-MOP.spec 15 Nov 2008 04:38:27 -0000 1.23
+++ perl-Class-MOP.spec 7 Dec 2008 04:25:55 -0000 1.24
@@ -1,5 +1,5 @@
Name: perl-Class-MOP
-Version: 0.70
+Version: 0.71
Release: 1%{?dist}
Summary: Metaobject programming model for Perl
License: GPL+ or Artistic
@@ -86,6 +86,9 @@
%{_mandir}/man3/*
%changelog
+* Sat Dec 06 2008 Chris Weyl <cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu> 0.71-1
+- update to 0.71
+
* Fri Nov 14 2008 Chris Weyl <cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu> 0.70-1
- update to 0.70
Index: sources
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/perl-Class-MOP/devel/sources,v
retrieving revision 1.19
retrieving revision 1.20
diff -u -r1.19 -r1.20
--- sources 15 Nov 2008 04:38:27 -0000 1.19
+++ sources 7 Dec 2008 04:25:55 -0000 1.20
@@ -1 +1 @@
-109b0b35e7911ef899f25036c96e200b Class-MOP-0.70.tar.gz
+ef4971d34f15ed3a047defaa901fc050 Class-MOP-0.71.tar.gz
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 470053] New: perl-Padre needs version 1.50
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Padre needs version 1.50
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=470053
Summary: perl-Padre needs version 1.50
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-Module-Starter
AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
ReportedBy: mmaslano(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu,
fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Please update this package to the latest upstream version.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months
[Bug 474867] Review Request: perl-B-Utils - Helper functions for op tree manipulation
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474867
Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu
Flag| |fedora-review+
--- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> 2008-12-06 18:28:06 EDT ---
Not much to say here. I agree that the rpmlint complaint is OK, as
occasionally a single internal header file comes as part of a binary Perl
module.
One of the tests is skipped due to a lack of Test::Signature, but honestly
verifying signatures as part of the test suite isn't useful in all cases. If
we need to patch a file, for example, the tests would fail.
* source files match upstream. sha256sum:
b2609a722def7499952831f4a72fd0bf6786e64414bd74607cd89637bbb2d59a
B-Utils-0.07.tar.gz
* package meets naming and versioning guidelines.
* specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently.
* summary is OK.
* description is OK.
* dist tag is present.
* build root is OK.
* license field matches the actual license.
* license is open source-compatible.
* license text not included upstream.
* latest version is being packaged.
* BuildRequires are proper.
* compiler flags are appropriate.
* %clean is present.
* package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64).
* package installs properly.
* debuginfo package looks complete.
* rpmlint has acceptable complaints.
* final provides and requires are sane:
Utils.so()(64bit)
perl(B::Utils) = 0.07
perl(B::Utils::Install::Files)
perl(B::Utils::OP) = 0.07
perl-B-Utils = 0.07-1.fc11
perl-B-Utils(x86-64) = 0.07-1.fc11
=
perl >= 0:5.006
perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0)
perl(B)
perl(B::Utils)
perl(Carp)
perl(Exporter)
perl(Scalar::Util)
perl(base)
perl(strict)
perl(subs)
perl(vars)
perl(warnings)
* %check is present and all tests pass:
All tests successful.
Files=22, Tests=136, 1 wallclock secs ( 0.06 usr 0.03 sys + 0.54 cusr
0.08 csys = 0.71 CPU)
* no shared libraries are added to the regular linker search paths.
* owns the directories it creates.
* doesn't own any directories it shouldn't.
* no duplicates in %files.
* file permissions are appropriate.
* no generically named files
* code, not content.
* documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary.
* %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package.
APPROVED
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
15 years, 5 months