[Bug 669320] New: perl-DateTime Newer in EPEL 6 than in RHEL 6
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-DateTime Newer in EPEL 6 than in RHEL 6
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=669320
Summary: perl-DateTime Newer in EPEL 6 than in RHEL 6
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: el6
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-DateTime
AssignedTo: tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
ReportedBy: myllynen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com,
tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
EPEL 6 has perl-DateTime-0.5300-4.el6 but RHEL 6 Optional only has
perl-DateTime-0.5300-1.el6 - this is against
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/EPEL6-FAQ#What_can_be_in_EPEL.3F
Could this be corrected so that the EPEL package won't update the RHEL package?
Thanks.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 9 months
[Bug 828517] New: CVE-2011-5092 rt3: remote arbitrary code execution and privilege elevation flaw [epel-6]
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=828517
Bug ID: 828517
Keywords: Security, SecurityTracking
Blocks: 828512
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: high
Version: el6
Priority: high
CC: mmahut(a)redhat.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tremble(a)tremble.org.uk, xavier(a)bachelot.org
Assignee: xavier(a)bachelot.org
Summary: CVE-2011-5092 rt3: remote arbitrary code execution and
privilege elevation flaw [epel-6]
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Linux
Reporter: vdanen(a)redhat.com
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: All
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: rt3
Product: Fedora EPEL
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure
that one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in affected Fedora
versions.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against "Security Response" product referenced in the "Blocks" field.
For more information see:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
When creating a Bodhi update request, please include this bug ID and the
bug IDs of this bug's parent bugs filed against the "Security Response"
product (the top-level CVE bugs). Please mention the CVE IDs being fixed
in the RPM changelog when available.
Bodhi update submission link:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/new/?type_=security&bugs=828512
epel-6 tracking bug for rt3: see blocks bug list for full details of the
security issue(s).
[bug automatically created by: add-tracking-bugs]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 9 months
[Bug 647783] New: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be installed
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=647783
Summary: perl-Mail-Box shouldn't force spamassassin to be
installed
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl-Mail-Box
AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jik(a)kamens.brookline.ma.us
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: tcallawa(a)redhat.com, fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
People who aren't planning on using spamassassin shouldn't be forced to install
it just to be able to use the modules in perl-Mail-Box, most of which are
totally independent of spamassassin.
One fix would be to remove the dependency on Mail::SpamAssassin completely from
the perl-Mail-Box RPM, in which case, people who try to use spamassassin
functionality in perl-Mail-Box will simply get an error because of the missing
module and know they need to install spamassassin.
Another fix would be to split the perl modules in spamassassin into a separate
RPM, e.g., spamassassin-perl, so they can be installed without the rest of
spamassassin.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9 years, 9 months