[Bug 1731719] New: perl-DBD-Firebird depends on files/directories
from non-standard locations
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731719
Bug ID: 1731719
Summary: perl-DBD-Firebird depends on files/directories from
non-standard locations
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-DBD-Firebird
Assignee: redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de
Reporter: i.gnatenko.brain(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de
Blocks: 1731683
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Hello,
Fedora Packaging Guidelines allow dependencies only on files/directories from
/usr/bin, /usr/sbin and /etc directories[0].
Your package depends on files/directories outside of those. See below for more
information about package/dependencies.
---
perl-DBD-Firebird-1.31-6.fc31.src:
- /usr/lib64/libfbclient.so
---
Please correct those or provide reason why is it correct.
It is very important to not download huge filelists.xml just because few
packages in distribution depend on non-standard paths.
Thanks for cooperation!
[0]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_file_and_dire...
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731683
[Bug 1731683] Packages which are not following Packaging Guidelines
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 7 months
[Bug 1744690] New: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744690
Bug ID: 1744690
Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Plack
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Plack
Assignee: rc040203(a)freenet.de
Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
rc040203(a)freenet.de
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
It would be helpful if this module was packaged for EPEL8
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
There are two AppStream modules for perl in RHEL8 right now. I'm not sure what
the EPEL plan is for multi-perl....
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3 years, 11 months
[Bug 1726138] New: Tk::Text ignores non-ASCII input from a keyboard
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1726138
Bug ID: 1726138
Summary: Tk::Text ignores non-ASCII input from a keyboard
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Tk
Assignee: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tremble(a)tremble.org.uk, xavier(a)bachelot.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
This code:
#!/usr/bin/perl
use strict;
use warnings;
use Tk;
my $mw = MainWindow->new;
$mw->title ($]);
my $tw = $mw->Text (
-font => "{ DejaVu Sans Mono } 9",
)->pack (-side => "top", -expand => 1, -fill => "both", -anchor => "nw");
MainLoop;
creates a text area widget where one can write a text as in a text editor.
If I press 'A' key, 'a' appears. That's fine.
If I press key that returns a non-ASCII character (e.g. '5' key on Czech
keyboard should return 'ř' character), nothing shows.
I still can insert the non-ASCII characters from a primary X11 selection by
pressing a middle mouse button. Thus I conclude perl-Tk ignores non-ASCII keys.
This happens with any perl-Tk-804.034 or perl-libs. Also upstream sources
suffer from this. A previous perl-Tk-804.033 ignores all keys, including ASCII
ones.
I guess something has changes in X11 and the bundled Tk does not process
Unicode labels from the key press events.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 1688773] New: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match line
1077, 1086, 1093, 763
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1688773
Bug ID: 1688773
Summary: Use of uninitialized value in pattern match line 1077,
1086, 1093, 763
Product: Fedora
Version: 29
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Expect
Severity: medium
Assignee: paul(a)city-fan.org
Reporter: sitezreg(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com, paul(a)city-fan.org,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
tremble(a)tremble.org.uk
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Using a cluster command console in "Asbru Connection Manager" throws following
error(s):
Use of uninitialized value in pattern match (m//) at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Expect.pm line 1077.
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Expect.pm line 1086.
Use of uninitialized value in string eq at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Expect.pm line 1093.
Use of uninitialized value in regexp compilation at
/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Expect.pm line 763.
Note: I've raised the bugreport for the Asbru developer (See:
https://github.com/asbru-cm/asbru-cm/issues/134) but was told it is an
Expect-related issue so here i am.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Expect-1.35-6.fc29.noarch
Sadly i don't know what exactly is being called under the hood.
Thanks
Alex
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 1744785] New: (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Proc-Daemon
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744785
Bug ID: 1744785
Summary: (RFE) EPEL8 branch of perl-Proc-Daemon
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Proc-Daemon
Assignee: johan(a)x-tnd.be
Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, johan(a)x-tnd.be,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
It would be helpful if this module was packaged for EPEL8
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
There are two AppStream modules for perl in RHEL8 right now. I'm not sure what
the EPEL plan is for multi-perl....
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 1744684] New: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Mojolicious
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744684
Bug ID: 1744684
Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-Mojolicious
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Mojolicious
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com, yaneti(a)declera.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
It would be helpful if this module was packaged for EPEL8
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
There are two AppStream modules for perl in RHEL8 right now. I'm not sure what
the EPEL plan is for multi-perl....
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
[Bug 1744707] New: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-CGI-Compile
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1744707
Bug ID: 1744707
Summary: [RFE] EPEL8 branch of perl-CGI-Compile
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-CGI-Compile
Assignee: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr
Reporter: riehecky(a)fnal.gov
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: emmanuel(a)seyman.fr, jose.p.oliveira.oss(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
It would be helpful if this module was packaged for EPEL8
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
There are two AppStream modules for perl in RHEL8 right now. I'm not sure what
the EPEL plan is for multi-perl....
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
4 years
