[Bug 1970389] New: Upgrade perl-Net-Telnet-Cisco to 1.12
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970389
Bug ID: 1970389
Summary: Upgrade perl-Net-Telnet-Cisco to 1.12
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-Telnet-Cisco
Assignee: colin.coe(a)gmail.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: colin.coe(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 1.11 version. Upstream released 1.12. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years
[Bug 1942850] New: Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.12
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1942850
Bug ID: 1942850
Summary: Upgrade perl-File-Touch to 0.12
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-File-Touch
Assignee: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com
Reporter: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: andrea.veri(a)gmail.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest Fedora delivers 0.11 version. Upstream released 0.12. When you have free
time, please upgrade it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2 years
[Bug 2066618] New: perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2-21.fc37 FTBFS: Failed
test 'Could retrieve table structure'
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066618
Bug ID: 2066618
Summary: perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2-21.fc37 FTBFS: Failed test
'Could retrieve table structure'
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Database-DumpTruck
Assignee: lkundrak(a)v3.sk
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jtfas90(a)gmail.com, lkundrak(a)v3.sk,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2045102 (F37FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Link ID: CPAN 140749
Classification: Fedora
perl-Database-DumpTruck-1.2-21.fc37 fails to build in Fedora 37 because a test
fails:
+ ./Build test
# Failed test 'Could retrieve table structure'
# at t/dumptruck.t line 141.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[0]{type} = 'TEXT'
# $expected->[0]{type} = 'text'
# Failed test 'Proper table structure creates'
# at t/dumptruck.t line 173.
# Structures begin differing at:
# $got->[0]{type} = 'INTEGER'
# $expected->[0]{type} = 'integer'
# Looks like you failed 2 tests of 43.
t/dumptruck.t ..
Dubious, test returned 2 (wstat 512, 0x200)
Failed 2/43 subtests
This is triggered by upgrading sqlite from 3.36.0 to 3.38.0. See a patch posted
an upstream <https://rt.cpan.org/Public/Bug/Display.html?id=140749>.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045102
[Bug 2045102] Fedora 37 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066618
2 years
[Bug 2066621] New: perl-Gtk2-Spell-1.05-5.fc37 FTBFS: enchant error
for language: en at t/0.GtkSpell.t line 36.
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066621
Bug ID: 2066621
Summary: perl-Gtk2-Spell-1.05-5.fc37 FTBFS: enchant error for
language: en at t/0.GtkSpell.t line 36.
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
URL: https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/package/perl-Gtk2-Sp
ell
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Gtk2-Spell
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Blocks: 2045102 (F37FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Gtk2-Spell-1.05-5.fc37 fails to build in Fedora 37 because a test fails:
+ xvfb-run -d make test
"/usr/bin/perl" -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e 'cp_nonempty' -- Spell.bs
blib/arch/auto/Gtk2/Spell/Spell.bs 644
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 "/usr/bin/perl" "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-MTest::Harness"
"-e" "undef *Test::Harness::Switches; test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')"
t/*.t
enchant error for language: en at t/0.GtkSpell.t line 36.
# Looks like your test exited with 255 just after 2.
t/0.GtkSpell.t ..
Dubious, test returned 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
Failed 6/8 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
t/0.GtkSpell.t (Wstat: 65280 Tests: 2 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 255
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 8 tests but ran 2.
A difference between passing and failing build roots is at
<https://koschei.fedoraproject.org/build/12429465>. An upgrade of hunspell from
1.7.0-18.fc37 to 1.7.0-19.fc37 looks suspicious:
commit 5e321c5e7bd91babbb443dd2a28f4fee05efcd12 (HEAD -> rawhide,
origin/rawhide, origin/main, origin/f36, origin/HEAD)
Author: Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com>
Date: Wed Mar 16 11:50:57 2022 +0800
revert the myspell compat symlink changes (rhbz#2064189)
relative to 6ffc042, the only change now is really to add
/usr/share/hunspell to filesystem
This should also help with rpm-ostree, eg Silverblue 36:
currently dictionaries still in myspell/ can't be installed (upgraded).
So this simplifies things a lot and seems much cleaner
both pretrans and post for filesystem are gone.
The only downside is that any legacy apps with hardcoded
/usr/share/myspell might stop working for spellchecking.
Perhaps a hunspell-filesystem-compat package could be added
later to carry the symlink once all the Fedora dicts have been moved.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2045102
[Bug 2045102] Fedora 37 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2066621
2 years, 1 month
Proposal to retire perl-Crypt-RSA and its dependency chain
by Paul Howarth
Now that we have (or will have shortly) fully CryptX-based versions of
perl-Net-SSH-Perl in F-36, F-37 and all EPELs, it looks to me that
there are no remaining dependents of perl-Crypt-RSA in Fedora (other
than the Suggests: for it in perl-Net-SSH-Perl, but I can get rid of
that in due course).
I'm seriously considering retiring the following group of packages,
which are only currently used by perl-Crypt-RSA as far as I can tell:
perl-Crypt-RSA
perl-Crypt-Primes
perl-Crypt-Random
perl-Math-Pari
libpari23
The last release of Crypt-RSA was in 2009. Dana Jacobsen created an
alternative implementation
(https://metacpan.org/dist/Alt-Crypt-RSA-BigInt) that avoided the need
for Math::Pari, which would be a big win itself, but that doesn't look
to have gained any traction.
I introduced all of these packages (except libpari23) to Fedora back in
2005 when I needed them as dependencies of perl-Net-SSH-Perl. The
libpari package followed in 2012 because perl-Math-Pari doesn't tend to
keep up with contemporary pari releases, and is quite painful to
package anyway. The perl-Net-SSH-Perl package no longer needs the other
ones, and neither do I.
Does anyone see any issues with retiring these packages in Fedora?
Regards, Paul.
2 years, 1 month
[Bug 2064753] New: perl-PDL-2.077 is available
by bugzilla＠redhat.com
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064753
Bug ID: 2064753
Summary: perl-PDL-2.077 is available
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-PDL
Keywords: FutureFeature, Triaged
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: caillon+fedoraproject(a)gmail.com,
jakub.jedelsky(a)gmail.com, jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
kasal(a)ucw.cz, lkundrak(a)v3.sk,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
rhughes(a)redhat.com, rstrode(a)redhat.com,
sandmann(a)redhat.com, tjczepiel(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Latest upstream release: 2.077
Current version/release in rawhide: 2.76.0-1.fc37
URL: http://search.cpan.org/dist/PDL/
Please consult the package updates policy before you issue an update to a
stable branch: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Updates_Policy/
More information about the service that created this bug can be found at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upstream_release_monitoring
Please keep in mind that with any upstream change, there may also be packaging
changes that need to be made. Specifically, please remember that it is your
responsibility to review the new version to ensure that the licensing is still
correct and that no non-free or legally problematic items have been added
upstream.
Based on the information from Anitya:
https://release-monitoring.org/project/3205/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2064753
2 years, 1 month