[rpms/perl-Plack] PR #1: Move Apache handler ro sub-packages

[Jitka Plesnikova]

jplesnik opened a new pull-request against the project: `perl-Plack` that you are
following:
``
Move Apache handler ro sub-packages
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1

[Emmanuel Seyman]

The pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages` of project: `perl-Plack` has been
assigned to `eseyman` by eseyman.

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1

[Emmanuel Seyman]

eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages` that you are
following:
``
Thank you for this PR, Jikta. I've been meaning to work on this since the next version
of Bugzilla will  require PSGI and having handlers in their own subpackages makes things
simpler.
Ralf, any input before I merge this?
``

To reply, visit the link below
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1

[Ralf Corsepius]

On 5/11/21 2:06 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
>  
>  eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro sub-packages` that you are
> following:
>  ``
>  Thank you for this PR, Jikta. I've been meaning to work on this since the next
> version of Bugzilla will  require PSGI and having handlers in their own subpackages makes
> things simpler. 
Actually, I am surprized and irritated about not having been
informed 
beforehand nor having been CC:-ed by any means.

@Jitka: What is going on here?

I can't deny thinking, Fedoras infrastructure has derailed into an 
unusable, bureaucratic mess.

>  Ralf, any input before I merge this? 
No idea. Firstly I'd have to have look into this. Unfortunately, I 
probably will not have any time available for Fedora throughout the next 
couple of weeks..

Ralf

[Jitka Plesnikova - Gmail]

eseyman commented on the pull-request: `Move Apache handler ro
sub-packages` that you are following:
> > ``
> > Thank you for this PR, Jikta. I've been meaning to work on this since
> > the next version of Bugzilla will  require PSGI and having handlers
> > in their own subpackages makes things simpler.
>  Actually, I am surprized and irritated about not having been informed
>  beforehand nor having been CC:-ed by any means.
>
>  @Jitka: What is going on here?
>
>  I can't deny thinking, Fedoras infrastructure has derailed into an
>  unusable, bureaucratic mess. 
I mention problems with mod_perl in 'F35 Change: Perl 5.34' which were
sent to Fedora devel list on May 7.
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.34#Upgrade.2Fcompatibility_i...

I apologize, but more packages are affected and I am not able to contact
all maintainers,
so I used change page for it.

Regards,
Jitka

> > Ralf, any input before I merge this?
>
>  No idea. Firstly I'd have to have look into this. Unfortunately, I
>  probably will not have any time available for Fedora throughout the
>  next couple of weeks..
>
>  Ralf

[Emmanuel Seyman]

* Ralf Corsepius [11/05/2021 07:25] :
>  Actually, I am surprized and irritated about not having been informed
>  beforehand nor having been CC:-ed by any means. 
Strange, I got an email and I supposed you had too.

>  I can't deny thinking, Fedoras infrastructure has derailed into
> an unusable,
>  bureaucratic mess.
>  
>  No idea. Firstly I'd have to have look into this. Unfortunately, I probably
>  will not have any time available for Fedora throughout the next couple of
>  weeks.. 
Given that the release of Perl 5.34 is in a few days, waiting a number
of weeks sounds bureaucratic to the extreme.

I will merge this later today so the the rebase to 5.34 can happen. We
can always revert any number of these commits or improve them further.

Emmanuel

[Emmanuel Seyman]

eseyman merged a pull-request against the project: `perl-Plack` that you are following.

Merged pull-request:

``
Move Apache handler ro sub-packages
``

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Plack/pull-request/1