Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226285
Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
AssignedTo|mmaslano(a)redhat.com |pertusus(a)free.fr
--- Comment #19 from Stepan Kasal <skasal(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-14 11:57:24 EDT ---
Hello Pat,
(In reply to comment #17)
I am indeed ready to do the review;
great! Thanks a lot. Marcela (the current asisignee) agrees, so I'm
re-assigning the bug to you.
But I really dislike epochs too.
yep.
# the version is against the guidelines. However adherence to
# the guideline would imply using an epoch, which is very inconvenient.
# Given that this package is very slowly moving, and hoping that
# upstream skip one version to go straight to 0.47, it seems better
# not to use an epoch. If 0.46 is ever released, the epoch way would have
# to be used, but we are better avoiding that if possible.
That seems to me to be a better argumentation ;-)
Very nice and clear, thanks. What about the following small change, though?
s/this package is very slowly moving/this package's development is stalled
since Sep 1999/
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.