Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: cpanspec treats recommended dependencies to required
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Summary: cpanspec treats recommended dependencies to required Product: Fedora Version: 11 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: low Component: cpanspec AssignedTo: steve@silug.org ReportedBy: tim@tim-landscheidt.de QAContact: extras-qa@fedoraproject.org CC: steve@silug.org, fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com Classification: Fedora
Created an attachment (id=381464) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=381464) Patch to ignore "recommends" dependencies.
With cpanspec 1.78, META.yml's "recommends" dependencies are treated as "requires" ones. That is way too harsh and easily requires many more package updates than ordinarily necessary. The attached patch fixes this.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
--- Comment #1 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2010-04-28 07:39:04 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 11 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 11. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '11'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 11's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 11 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Ralf Corsepius rc040203@freenet.de changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |rc040203@freenet.de Version|11 |12
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
--- Comment #2 from Bug Zapper fedora-triage-list@redhat.com 2010-11-03 21:55:24 EDT ---
This message is a reminder that Fedora 12 is nearing its end of life. Approximately 30 (thirty) days from now Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 12. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as WONTFIX if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '12'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior to Fedora 12's end of life.
Bug Reporter: Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we may not be able to fix it before Fedora 12 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora please change the 'version' of this bug to the applicable version. If you are unable to change the version, please add a comment here and someone will do it for you.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
The process we are following is described here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/BugZappers/HouseKeeping
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Bug Zapper triage@lists.fedoraproject.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX Flag|needinfo?(tim@tim-landschei | |dt.de) | Last Closed| |2010-12-03 19:54:08
--- Comment #3 from Bug Zapper triage@lists.fedoraproject.org 2010-12-03 19:54:08 EST ---
Fedora 12 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2010-12-02. Fedora 12 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug.
If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version.
Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Steven Pritchard steve@silug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |ASSIGNED Resolution|WONTFIX | Keywords| |Reopened
--- Comment #4 from Steven Pritchard steve@silug.org 2010-12-07 15:04:59 EST --- I consciously added that, assuming that a lot of the dependencies for tests would be "recommends", which means that they are really "requires" as far as we're concerned.
That said, the current cpanspec (that I'm working on) actually scans tests for dependencies, so maybe the change would make sense. I'm not sure.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Steven Pritchard steve@silug.org changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|12 |rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
CJ Kucera pez@apocalyptech.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |pez@apocalyptech.com
--- Comment #6 from CJ Kucera pez@apocalyptech.com --- Yeah, this would be nice to patch in. Perhaps it makes sense to have an extra argument for handling these? So the user could choose how to deal with 'recommend'ed packages? Not that hand-editing the .spec file is difficult after-the-fact, of course.
(I came across this by stumbling across a fun loop where HTTP::Tiny recommends HTTP::CookieJar, which recommends Mozilla::PublicSuffix, which then *requires* HTTP::Tiny. Had been wondering how in the world that came to be until I noticed the recommend statements.)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ppisar@redhat.com
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar ppisar@redhat.com --- In my opinion, cpanspec should not add recommended modules to dependencies. However it should put them into the spec file as a comment. Reason is following:
There are various ways how Perl code can make a dependency optional. Some of them lead to program crash (if ($foo) { require Bar }). I tend to handle these cases as a hard dependencies at RPM level because packaged code should not die due to missing dependency. Only a packager can evaluate this problem properly. So the recommended modules should be written as a comment to strike the packager when reviewing the cpanspec output.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|steve@silug.org |extras-orphan@fedoraproject | |.org
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|extras-orphan@fedoraproject |psabata@redhat.com |.org |
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Admin XMLRPC Client fedora-admin-xmlrpc@redhat.com --- This package has changed ownership in the Fedora Package Database. Reassigning to the new owner of this component.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
--- Comment #10 from Fedora End Of Life endoflife@fedoraproject.org --- This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. Approximately 4 (four) weeks from now this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '19'.
Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version.
Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 19 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above.
Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Petr Šabata psabata@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Version|19 |rawhide
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=552105
Petr Šabata psabata@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Keywords| |FutureFeature
Red Hat Bugzilla bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Doc Type|Bug Fix |Enhancement
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org