Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
Summary: spamd is SO slow Product: Fedora Core Version: fc5 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: spamassassin AssignedTo: wtogami@redhat.com ReportedBy: redhat@nodata.co.uk CC: fedora-perl-devel- list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm@jmason.org,parkerm @pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami@redhat.com
downloading e-mail with evolution is REALLY slow. It takes about two minutes over a fast line to download 150 e-mails.
top shows spamd hogging the cpu.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
wtogami@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO_REPORTER
------- Additional Comments From wtogami@redhat.com 2006-07-09 21:15 EST ------- This is not enough information to possibly diagnose the problem.
Are you having long DNS timeouts by chance?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
redhat@nodata.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO_REPORTER |ASSIGNED
------- Additional Comments From redhat@nodata.co.uk 2006-07-10 02:23 EST ------- I doubt it, but I'll check.
In the meantime: Time to download 100 test e-mails without spamd: about 1 second. With spamd: about 10 seconds.
Each mail seems to be passed to spamd before the next one is downloaded, which is a bit bizarre.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
------- Additional Comments From kanarip@kanarip.com 2006-07-10 07:18 EST ------- Wouldn't you consider this undesirable behaviour by evolution, instead of unsuspected behaviour by spamassassin?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
------- Additional Comments From redhat@nodata.co.uk 2006-07-10 07:59 EST ------- Good point, yes, but it was more of a side comment.
spamd is still hogging the cpu, the db is only ten megs.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
------- Additional Comments From redhat@nodata.co.uk 2006-07-11 12:04 EST ------- It's not a dns problem. I added the mail server to /etc/hosts before checking e-mail, and it's not any faster.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
------- Additional Comments From steve@silug.org 2006-07-11 12:36 EST ------- (In reply to comment #5)
It's not a dns problem. I added the mail server to /etc/hosts before checking e-mail, and it's not any faster.
Which won't help a bit with spamassassin's DNSBL checks...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
------- Additional Comments From redhat@nodata.co.uk 2006-07-11 12:43 EST ------- Okay, so six comments in we're at where comment number 2 should have been.
"Have you tried turning off DNS checks by adding -L to SPAMDOPTIONS in /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin ?"
And the answer is no, I haven't, but I'll try it.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
------- Additional Comments From redhat@nodata.co.uk 2006-07-13 09:14 EST ------- Hurrah! Disabling non-local checks, did make spamd eat less CPU - MUCH less CPU. Which makes me wonder what on earth it was doing..
I have filed a separate bug 198767 about evolution seeming to pass each individual mail to spamd before downloading the next.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamd is SO slow
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=198081
wtogami@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG
------- Additional Comments From wtogami@redhat.com 2006-07-13 12:24 EST ------- There is something wrong with your network, it is not slow on a properly configured network.
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org