https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281865
--- Comment #3 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org> ---
Yes, it was intentional. Normally when branching for EPEL I use the latest
non-rebuild release, i.e. the last one in which a meaningful change happened.
In this case, when looking at the package I noticed its use of deprecated
%patch syntax so I fixed that, built it for rawhide and then rebuilt that for
epel8. I looked but couldn't find any policy relating to having an upgrade path
between EPEL versions so I think this is OK. I toyed with the idea of bumping
the epel9 package too but that would be a fairly meaningless update for most
users. What do you think?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2281865
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...