[Bug 1342160] New: perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS: BSSolv.xs:19 :22: fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
9:51 a.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
Bug ID: 1342160
Summary: perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22: fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file
or directory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Component: perl-BSSolv
Assignee: strzibny(a)gmail.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, strzibny(a)gmail.com
perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 fails to build in F25:
+ make -j4
Running Mkbootstrap for BSSolv ()
"/usr/bin/perl" "/usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/ExtUtils/xsubpp"
-typemap
'/usr/share/perl5/ExtUtils/typemap' -typemap
'/builddir/build/BUILD/perl-BSSolv-0.01/typemap' BSSolv.xs > BSSolv.xsc
chmod 644 "BSSolv.bs"
"/usr/bin/perl" -MExtUtils::Command::MM -e 'cp_nonempty' -- BSSolv.bs
blib/arch/auto/BSSolv/BSSolv.bs 644
cp BSSolv.pm blib/lib/BSSolv.pm
mv BSSolv.xsc BSSolv.c
gcc -c -I/usr/include/solv -D_REENTRANT -D_GNU_SOURCE -O2 -g -pipe -Wall
-Werror=format-security -Wp,-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2 -fexceptions
-fstack-protector-strong --param=ssp-buffer-size=4 -grecord-gcc-switches -m64
-mtune=generic -fwrapv -fno-strict-aliasing -I/usr/local/include
-D_LARGEFILE_SOURCE -D_FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64 -g -DVERSION=\"0.01\"
-DXS_VERSION=\"0.01\" -fPIC "-I/usr/lib64/perl5/CORE" BSSolv.c
BSSolv.xs:19:22: fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
#include "repo_deb.h"
^
compilation terminated.
Makefile:334: recipe for target 'BSSolv.o' failed
Difference between working and failing build root is:
libsolv-devel 0.6.21-1.fc25 > 0.6.21-2.fc25
libsolv 0.6.21-1.fc25 > 0.6.21-2.fc25
curl 7.49.0-1.fc25 > 7.49.1-1.fc25
python3-setuptools 20.9.0-1.fc25 > 21.2.2-1.fc25
shadow-utils 2:4.2.1-9.fc25 > 2:4.2.1-10.fc25
libcurl 7.49.0-1.fc25 > 7.49.1-1.fc25
This is probably caused by libsolve change
<http://pkgs.fedoraproject.org/cgit/rpms/libsolv.git/commit/?id=93e79d1e8a...
"Modify enabled/disabled features".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
9:52 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ignatenko(a)redhat.com
Flags| |needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat.
| |com)
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
Igor, disabling support for Debian repositories in libsolv was intentional?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
10:21 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ppisar(a)redhat.com
Flags|needinfo?(ignatenko@redhat. |needinfo?(ppisar(a)redhat.com
|com) |)
--- Comment #2 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #1)
Igor, disabling support for Debian repositories in libsolv was
intentional?
hm, actually yes. Didn't know that it would affect any packages.. Should I
enable it back? Which distversions?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
1:47 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(ppisar(a)redhat.com |
|) |
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
perl-BSSolv as it is now in all Fedora versions, requires support for Debian
and Arch repositories.
I can disable the support in perl-BSSolv. But I don't know what's the point of
removing the support. While perl-BSSolv is not used by anything in Fedora now,
I believe upstream uses it in the OpenSuse Build Service to support non-RPM
distributions.
But how can I figure out at compile time what support is available? I can see
the current /usr/include/solv/pool.h still declares DISTTYPE_DEB and
DISTTYPE_ARCH. Shouls they be removed from libsolv? I see perl-BSSolv uses
"#ifdef DISTTYPE_DEB" at some places (but not everywhere, that causes the build
failure). Would it be feasible for libsolv to use the DISTTYPE_* symbols for
communicating the support for optional features?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
3:43 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
Michael Schröder <mls(a)suse.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |mls(a)suse.de
--- Comment #4 from Michael Schröder <mls(a)suse.de> ---
You can't use DISTTYPE_DEB to check for the repo_deb functions. DISTTYPE_DEB
selects debian semanics in the pool (i.e. core libsolv). The repo_deb functions
are the debian package format parser functions, them come from the "extras"
part of libsolv. So those two have nothing in common.
As the requirements of OBS are somewhat different from normal system use, SUSE
builds perl-BSSolv with a bundled libsolv version. This is against Fedora
packaging policy, so you would need to get an exception if you want to go that
route.
Alternatively you have to convince Igor to enable the needed parts in the
system's libsolv. Those are ENABLE_DEBIAN, DENABLE_ARCHREPO,
ENABLE_LZMA_COMPRESSION, MULTI_SEMANTICS.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
6:56 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |RAWHIDE
Assignee|strzibny(a)gmail.com |ppisar(a)redhat.com
Last Closed| |2016-06-06 07:56:48
--- Comment #5 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
I applied patch to perl-BSSolv that builds the support for Debian and Arch
packages only if libsolv provides the header files.
It would be great if Igor justified why Fedora decided not to support them. It
makes Fedora less useful.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:40 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
--- Comment #6 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #5)
I applied patch to perl-BSSolv that builds the support for Debian and
Arch
packages only if libsolv provides the header files.
It would be great if Igor justified why Fedora decided not to support them.
It makes Fedora less useful.
Actually I thought that we don't have tools in Fedora which uses deb/arch
features. I can enable those features if you want ;)
Shall I?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:46 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
--- Comment #7 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
If enabling it does not have any serious drawbacks, then please reenable it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
7:54 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
--- Comment #8 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Petr Pisar from comment #7)
If enabling it does not have any serious drawbacks, then please
reenable it.
hm, should I enable it for Fedora only or for RHEL8+ also?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:02 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
--- Comment #9 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
I have no idea about RHEL8+ requirements. I think Fedora is enough.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
8:11 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
--- Comment #10 from Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com> ---
commit 44efe14df605d3c1fdd7326505b6a70f6b3d02f2
Author: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com>
Date: Mon Jun 6 15:09:15 2016 +0200
Enable deb/arch support for non-rhel distros
Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko <ignatenko(a)redhat.com>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2:25 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 1342160] perl-BSSolv-0.01-11.git1e18c32.fc25 FTBFS:
BSSolv.xs:19:22:
fatal error: repo_deb.h: No such file or directory
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1342160
Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Fixed In Version| |perl-BSSolv-0.01-13.git1e18
| |c32.fc25
--- Comment #11 from Petr Pisar <ppisar(a)redhat.com> ---
Thanks. I rebuilt perl-BSSolv again to regain support for the formats.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
2916
days inactive
2921
days old
perl-devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
11 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
Red Hat Bugzilla