MC; asking the obvious here but does [1] work via the web interface? As Cole pointed out,
this is mostly to do with the instance.
I tried the following on landfill,
$ bugzilla query
--from-url="https://landfill.bugzilla.org/bugzilla-4.4-branch/buglist.cgi?f1=bug_id&f2=alias&f3=cf_free_text&o1=greaterthan&o2=notsubstring&o3=regexp&query_format=advanced&v1=41000&v2=-&v3=%5E%24"
Server error: <Fault 108: "Can't use cf_free_text as a field name.">
$ bugzilla query
--from-url="https://landfill.bugzilla.org/bugzilla-4.4-branch/buglist.cgi?f1=bug_id&f2=alias&o1=greaterthan&o2=notsubstring&query_format=advanced&v1=41000"
--snip results--
So stock bugzilla should work file with that query (the custom field issue seems to be
independent), so I suspect your instance will need to be looked at.
That being said, you could try using a saved search by passing in the savedsearch or
savedsearch_sharer_id parameter when building the query as a workaround.
hth
-arun
[1]
From: "Mildred Clarke" <gargoyle.python(a)gmail.com>
To: "Cole Robinson" <crobinso(a)redhat.com>
Cc: python-bugzilla(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
Sent: Thursday, November 13, 2014 3:37:08 AM
Subject: Re: [python-bugzilla] Fwd: Complex Query Support
Thanks for the reply on this issue. I've tried the "bugzilla" command line
with --from-url option and the results are basically the same. At this
point it looks like I will need to perform the advanced query from the Web
UI, export the result set to CSV file, then import into my script for
processing which is not ideal. It's workable, but not ideal.
Can anyone think of a better option / workaround to obtain an "advanced
query" result set ?
Thanks
MC
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 8:18 AM, Cole Robinson <crobinso(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On 11/12/2014 11:12 AM, Mildred Clarke wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> The python-bugzilla implementation is great but I have one issue that I
>> cannot
>> seem to find resolution on. Was hoping that someone here could shed some
>> light
>> on the situation. I have attempted a few different ways and upon review
>> of the
>> source I don't think* what I am attempting to do is supported in the
>> version I
>> am using (1.1.0)
>>
>> When I attempt to build a complex query, the url_to_query method returns a
>> dictionary object that appears to contain the appropriate values. However,
>> when attempting to query the remote bugzilla instance an error message is
>> displayed and no results are returned. I believe this is due to the use
>> of
>> the "advanced" query format. The error message is complaining about
the
>> use of
>> "v1" and sometimes "o2". Is it the use of Regex ? Is it my
bugzilla
>> instance ?
>>
>> Message and code snips below.
>>
>> --- Error Message ---
>> Fault: <Fault 53: 'v1 is not a valid parameter for the
>> Bugzilla::Bug::match
>> function.'>
>>
>> --- Error Message ---
>> Fault: <Fault 53: 'o2 is not a valid parameter for the
>> Bugzilla::Bug::match
>> function.'>
>>
>>
>> --- CODE SNIP ---
>> q_url="https://bugzilla.local/query.cgi?bug_status=New&bug_
>> status=Accepted&bug_status=Reopened&f1=cf_custom_field_
>> here&f2=bug_id&f3=alias&o1=regexp&o2=greaterthan&o3=
>> notsubstring&query_format=advanced&v1=^%24&v2=410000&v3=-"
>>
>> Returns the values in a dictionary with this command --
>> bz.url_to_query(q_url)
>>
>> {'bug_status': ['New', 'Accepted', 'Reopened'],
>> 'f1': 'cf_custom_field_here',
>> 'f2': 'bug_id',
>> 'f3': 'alias',
>> 'o1': 'regexp',
>> 'o2': 'greaterthan',
>> 'o3': 'notsubstring',
>> 'query_format': 'advanced',
>> 'v1': '^$',
>> 'v2': '410000',
>> 'v3': '-'}
>>
>> This is the actual code that will produce the error message. bz is my
>> bugzilla
>> connection.
>> """ bz.query(bz.url_to_query(q_url)) """. As you
can see, I am using the
>> "advanced" formatting. If I don't include the "f*, v*,
o*" parameters
>> queries
>> return a result set.
>>
>> Let me know if you need more details to help figure out this issue.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Mildred.
>>
>
> The query_format=advanced support is a
bugzilla.redhat.com custom
> extension, so probably doesn't work for your local bugzilla instance. There
> was some talk at one point of extending upstream bugzilla to support
> something similar, but AFAICT that doesn't exist yet.
>
> - Cole
>
>
_______________________________________________
python-bugzilla mailing list
python-bugzilla(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://lists.fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/python-bugzilla