On 11/12/2014 11:12 AM, Mildred Clarke wrote:
All,
The python-bugzilla implementation is great but I have one issue that I cannot
seem to find resolution on. Was hoping that someone here could shed some light
on the situation. I have attempted a few different ways and upon review of the
source I don't think* what I am attempting to do is supported in the version I
am using (1.1.0)
When I attempt to build a complex query, the url_to_query method returns a
dictionary object that appears to contain the appropriate values. However,
when attempting to query the remote bugzilla instance an error message is
displayed and no results are returned. I believe this is due to the use of
the "advanced" query format. The error message is complaining about the use of
"v1" and sometimes "o2". Is it the use of Regex ? Is it my bugzilla
instance ?
Message and code snips below.
--- Error Message ---
Fault: <Fault 53: 'v1 is not a valid parameter for the Bugzilla::Bug::match
function.'>
--- Error Message ---
Fault: <Fault 53: 'o2 is not a valid parameter for the Bugzilla::Bug::match
function.'>
--- CODE SNIP ---
q_url="https://bugzilla.local/query.cgi?bug_status=New&bug_status=Accepted&bug_status=Reopened&f1=cf_custom_field_here&f2=bug_id&f3=alias&o1=regexp&o2=greaterthan&o3=notsubstring&query_format=advanced&v1=^%24&v2=410000&v3=-"
Returns the values in a dictionary with this command --
bz.url_to_query(q_url)
{'bug_status': ['New', 'Accepted', 'Reopened'],
'f1': 'cf_custom_field_here',
'f2': 'bug_id',
'f3': 'alias',
'o1': 'regexp',
'o2': 'greaterthan',
'o3': 'notsubstring',
'query_format': 'advanced',
'v1': '^$',
'v2': '410000',
'v3': '-'}
This is the actual code that will produce the error message. bz is my bugzilla
connection.
""" bz.query(bz.url_to_query(q_url)) """. As you can see, I
am using the
"advanced" formatting. If I don't include the "f*, v*, o*"
parameters queries
return a result set.
Let me know if you need more details to help figure out this issue.
Thanks
Mildred.
The query_format=advanced support is a
bugzilla.redhat.com custom extension,
so probably doesn't work for your local bugzilla instance. There was some talk
at one point of extending upstream bugzilla to support something similar, but
AFAICT that doesn't exist yet.
- Cole