----- Original Message -----
On 08/06/2012 04:22 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> The only distribution that has switched is arch. When they did
> there was
> a big uproar about how arch was doing something wrong which
> eventually
> resulted in that PEP.
Yeah, we mainly wrote PEP 394 in order to nudge *everyone else* into
providing a /usr/bin/python2 symlink to help deal with Arch making
their
bold leap into the unknown (as well as going on record that we think
switching it *right now* is still a bad idea). There's "bleeding
edge"
and then there's "tap dancing on razor blades in your bare feet" :P
To be honest, I expect that the long term outcome will be that
"/usr/bin/python" becomes solely the preserve of the OS, with all
cross-platform scripts and applications using "/usr/bin/pythonX",
software collections, or language level virtual environments.
From an end user perspective, having things mostly compatible with
both
2 and 3 should come *before* that symlink gets flipped rather than
after.
Cheers,
Nick.
Ok, then I would suggest using Tom Spura's idea about making only python2- and
python3- packages (maybe with the virtual python- provides for python2- packages, as
Toshio has mentioned). We could target this for F19 and we could also start helping
various upstreams with switching to python 3 and see where this will take us. Does that
sound good?
--
Nick Coghlan
Red Hat Infrastructure Engineering & Development, Brisbane
_______________________________________________
python-devel mailing list
python-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/python-devel
--
Regards,
Bohuslav "Slavek" Kabrda.