Running suite loop_job fail

[Dietmar Maurer]

Running suite(s): loop_job
 loop_timers
average error for 1500000 ns timer is 19341 (ns) (1.289448)
timer expired early! by 52553
85%: Checks: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0
check_loop.c:100:P:limits:test_loop_job_input:0: Passed
check_loop.c:117:P:run_one:test_loop_job_1:0: Passed
check_loop.c:134:P:run_recursive:test_loop_job_4:0: Passed
check_loop.c:150:P:run_500:test_loop_job_nuts:0: Passed
check_loop.c:196:P:limits:test_loop_timer_input:0: Passed
check_loop.c:241:P:basic:test_loop_timer_basic:0: Passed
check_loop.c:270:F:precision:test_loop_timer_precision:0: Assertion 'diff >=
sw->ns_timer' failed
FAIL: check_loop

Does that work for you?

[Dietmar Maurer]

A kernel update solved that problem - it works now.

>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: quarterback-devel-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
>  Dietmar Maurer
>  Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 12:59
>  To: quarterback-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  Subject: [libqb] Running suite loop_job fail
>  
>  Running suite(s): loop_job
>   loop_timers
>  average error for 1500000 ns timer is 19341 (ns) (1.289448) timer expired
>  early! by 52553
>  85%: Checks: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0
>  check_loop.c:100:P:limits:test_loop_job_input:0: Passed
>  check_loop.c:117:P:run_one:test_loop_job_1:0: Passed
>  check_loop.c:134:P:run_recursive:test_loop_job_4:0: Passed
>  check_loop.c:150:P:run_500:test_loop_job_nuts:0: Passed
>  check_loop.c:196:P:limits:test_loop_timer_input:0: Passed
>  check_loop.c:241:P:basic:test_loop_timer_basic:0: Passed
>  check_loop.c:270:F:precision:test_loop_timer_precision:0: Assertion 'diff >=
>  sw->ns_timer' failed
>  FAIL: check_loop
>  
>  Does that work for you?
>

[Angus Salkeld]

On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:11:59PM +0000, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
>  A kernel update solved that problem - it works now.
>  
>  > -----Original Message-----
>  > From: quarterback-devel-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  > [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
>  > Dietmar Maurer
>  > Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 12:59
>  > To: quarterback-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  > Subject: [libqb] Running suite loop_job fail
>  > 
>  > Running suite(s): loop_job
>  >  loop_timers
>  > average error for 1500000 ns timer is 19341 (ns) (1.289448) timer expired
>  > early! by 52553
>  > 85%: Checks: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0
>  > check_loop.c:100:P:limits:test_loop_job_input:0: Passed
>  > check_loop.c:117:P:run_one:test_loop_job_1:0: Passed
>  > check_loop.c:134:P:run_recursive:test_loop_job_4:0: Passed
>  > check_loop.c:150:P:run_500:test_loop_job_nuts:0: Passed
>  > check_loop.c:196:P:limits:test_loop_timer_input:0: Passed
>  > check_loop.c:241:P:basic:test_loop_timer_basic:0: Passed
>  > check_loop.c:270:F:precision:test_loop_timer_precision:0: Assertion 'diff >=
>  > sw->ns_timer' failed
>  > FAIL: check_loop
>  > 
>  > Does that work for you? 
This test is to confirm that we never get timers firing earlier than
requested, later is fine but too early is not. It has never failed for me.

-Angus

>  > 
>  
>  _______________________________________________
>  quarterback-devel mailing list
>  quarterback-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/quarterback-devel

[Steven Dake]

On 12/18/2010 02:34 AM, Angus Salkeld wrote:
>  On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:11:59PM +0000, Dietmar Maurer wrote:
> > A kernel update solved that problem - it works now.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: quarterback-devel-bounces(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >> [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf Of
> >> Dietmar Maurer
> >> Sent: Donnerstag, 16. Dezember 2010 12:59
> >> To: quarterback-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> >> Subject: [libqb] Running suite loop_job fail
> >>
> >> Running suite(s): loop_job
> >>  loop_timers
> >> average error for 1500000 ns timer is 19341 (ns) (1.289448) timer expired
> >> early! by 52553
> >> 85%: Checks: 7, Failures: 1, Errors: 0
> >> check_loop.c:100:P:limits:test_loop_job_input:0: Passed
> >> check_loop.c:117:P:run_one:test_loop_job_1:0: Passed
> >> check_loop.c:134:P:run_recursive:test_loop_job_4:0: Passed
> >> check_loop.c:150:P:run_500:test_loop_job_nuts:0: Passed
> >> check_loop.c:196:P:limits:test_loop_timer_input:0: Passed
> >> check_loop.c:241:P:basic:test_loop_timer_basic:0: Passed
> >> check_loop.c:270:F:precision:test_loop_timer_precision:0: Assertion 'diff
> >=
> >> sw->ns_timer' failed
> >> FAIL: check_loop
> >>
> >> Does that work for you?
>  
>  This test is to confirm that we never get timers firing earlier than
>  requested, later is fine but too early is not. It has never failed for me.
>  
>  -Angus
>   
Curious which kernel version you were using that exhibited this problem?

Regards
-steve

> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > quarterback-devel mailing list
> > quarterback-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> > https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/quarterback-devel
>  _______________________________________________
>  quarterback-devel mailing list
>  quarterback-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
>  https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/quarterback-devel

[Dietmar Maurer]

>  > This test is to confirm that we never get timers firing earlier
> than
>  > requested, later is fine but too early is not. It has never failed for me.
>  >
>  > -Angus
>  >
>  
>  Curious which kernel version you were using that exhibited this problem? 
ubuntu lucid git branch "Ubuntu-2.6.32-7.10"

- Dietmar