Re: FAS Group and Group permissions
On Friday, 29 May 2015 12:46 AM, Fabio Olive Leite
<fabio.olive(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> On 2015-05-27 Eric Christensen wrote:
> We seem to have two FAS groups of interest: security-team[0] and
> gitfedora- security-team[1]. The prior is just a membership group
> while the latter allows commit access to the fedora-security-team git
> repo[2].
I just applied to the membership group. :-)
Applied to both the groups.
> I propose we put all the members of the membership group onto the
git
> group (and maybe they can by regularly synchronized automatically?).
I would still have it as a separate membership, for people that
actually want to help maintain scripts and stuff in the repo. We still
must document it somewhere, of course, so that we don't have to be
surprised finding it again in some months. :)
Yes, +1. Separate is better, as not all members need to maintain scripts/tools etc.
---
Regards
-P J P
http://feedmug.com