[PATCH] Do not call sudo functions if built without-sudo

[Jakub Hrozek]

Apparently I just can't get this one thing right. I introduced another
run-time bug when SSSD is built --without-sudo.

A patch is attached. Sorry for the breakage (again).

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 17:11 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> Apparently I just can't get this one thing right. I introduced another
> run-time bug when SSSD is built --without-sudo.
>
> A patch is attached. Sorry for the breakage (again).

Nack.

You don't want to be passing the reference to pvt_data. It's already a
(void **)

[Jakub Hrozek]

On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:13:44PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 17:11 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > Apparently I just can't get this one thing right. I introduced another
> > run-time bug when SSSD is built --without-sudo.
> >
> > A patch is attached. Sorry for the breakage (again).
>
> Nack.
>
> You don't want to be passing the reference to pvt_data. It's already a
> (void **)

As I said, I can't get this one right. Thank you, new patch is attached.

[Stephen Gallagher]

On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 22:09 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 05, 2012 at 12:13:44PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > On Sun, 2012-02-05 at 17:11 +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > > Apparently I just can't get this one thing right. I introduced another
> > > run-time bug when SSSD is built --without-sudo.
> > >
> > > A patch is attached. Sorry for the breakage (again).
> >
> > Nack.
> >
> > You don't want to be passing the reference to pvt_data. It's already a
> > (void **)
>
> As I said, I can't get this one right. Thank you, new patch is attached.

Ack and pushed to master.