4:56 p.m.
This is a backport of Stephen's patch
2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer
running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the
sssd-1-5 branch as well.
4:59 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Only use paging control on requests for multiple entries (1.5 backport)
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
This is a backport of Stephen's patch
2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer
running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the
sssd-1-5 branch as well.
The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
8:28 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Only use paging control on requests for multiple entries (1.5 backport)
On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> This is a backport of Stephen's patch
> 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer
> running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the
> sssd-1-5 branch as well.
The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5
"LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
LS
9:43 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Only use paging control on requests for multiple entries (1.5 backport)
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> This is a backport of Stephen's patch
>> 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer
>> running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the
>> sssd-1-5 branch as well.
>
>The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5
"LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
LS
Yes, it's not strictly necessary but might come handy. New patches are
attached.
9:50 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Only use paging control on requests for multiple entries (1.5 backport)
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> >> This is a backport of Stephen's patch
> >> 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A customer
> >> running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the
> >> sssd-1-5 branch as well.
> >
> >The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
>
> You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5
> "LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
>
> LS
Yes, it's not strictly necessary but might come handy. New patches are
attached.
One more patch is attached to amend the man page.
8:37 a.m.
New subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Only use paging control on requests for multiple entries (1.5 backport)
On (29/04/13 16:50), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
> > On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
> > >> This is a backport of Stephen's patch
> > >> 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A
customer
> > >> running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for the
> > >> sssd-1-5 branch as well.
> > >
> > >The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
> >
> > You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5
> > "LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
> >
> > LS
>
> Yes, it's not strictly necessary but might come handy. New patches are
> attached.
One more patch is attached to amend the man page.
3x Ack
LS
12:45 p.m.
New subject: [PATCH] LDAP: Only use paging control on requests for multiple entries (1.5 backport)
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 03:37:32PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
On (29/04/13 16:50), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 04:43:36PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 03:28:33PM +0200, Lukas Slebodnik wrote:
>> > On (24/04/13 23:59), Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > >On Wed, Apr 24, 2013 at 11:56:48PM +0200, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>> > >> This is a backport of Stephen's patch
>> > >> 2f3ee3f49019f5b60adbe073070f31e6e2d7c7ab for the 1.5 branch. A
customer
>> > >> running RHEL5 was hit by the issue so a backport was needed for
the
>> > >> sssd-1-5 branch as well.
>> > >
>> > >The subject should say this is a 1.5 backport only.
>> >
>> > You should also backport 8270b1b8505e4bce5ec065daa8fcdf985e1fc9f5
>> > "LDAP: Add option to disable paging control"
>> >
>> > LS
>>
>> Yes, it's not strictly necessary but might come handy. New patches are
>> attached.
>
>One more patch is attached to amend the man page.
3x Ack
Pushed to sssd-1-5.
4021
days inactive
4029
days old
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
6 comments
2 participants
participants (2)
-
Jakub Hrozek -
Lukas Slebodnik