On 03/04/2013 04:55 PM, Thorsten Scherf wrote:
>On [Mon, 04.03.2013 11:28], Ondrej Kos wrote:
>>On 02/28/2013 02:01 PM, Thorsten Scherf wrote:
>>>On [Thu, 28.02.2013 11:25], Sumit Bose wrote:
>>>>On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 10:46:10AM +0100, Jakub Hrozek wrote:
>>>>>On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 09:36:13AM +0100, Sumit Bose wrote:
>>>>>>On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 09:51:16PM +0100, Thorsten Scherf wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>Hi Thorsten,
>>>>>>
>>>>>>thank you for the patch and bringing the attention to the
*.doxy.in
>>>>>>files. Those files are autogenerated by doxygen where this typo
and
>>>>>>others are already fixed upstream. Instead of fixing the typos
>>>>>>individually I wonder if it would be better to run doxygen -u on
all
>>>>>>*.doxy.in files? But I'm not sure if files created by a newer
version
>>>>>>can be handled by older versions as well. E.g. make docs is used
in
>>>>>the
>>>>>>RHEL-6 spec file which still uses doxygen-1.6.1. Does anyone
know
>>>>>if it
>>>>>>will just ignore new options or will it fail?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>bye,
>>>>>>Sumit
>>>>>
>>>>>I remember from fixing another related issue that old doxygen
releases
>>>>>would complain about an unknown option but would not fail.
>>>>>
>>>>>So I think we can refresh the files, yes. Can you open a ticket?
>>>>
>>>>I've created
https://fedorahosted.org/sssd/ticket/1819 .
>>>>
>>>>Thorsten, are you interested in providing a new patch here?
>>>
>>>Patch attached.
>>>
>>>The configs have been update based on doxygen-1.8.3.
>>>
>>>Cheers,
>>>Thorsten
>>>
>>Hi Thorsten,
>>
>>I tested the documentation build with few versions of doxygen, and
>>everything works fine. Could you please just add the trac link to the
>>patch commit message?
>
>Correct patch attached this time.
>
>Cheers,
>Thorsten
Thanks for the patch, Thorsten
Ack