sssd linking with krb5's libkrad0

[Andreas Hasenack]

Hi,

I was reviewing an Ubuntu merge of sssd 2.7.1 and saw that the new
sssd-idp package links with MIT kerberos libkrad0. libkrad-dev in
Debian has this notice in its description[1]:
```
 This package includes development headers for libkrad0, the MIT
 Kerberos RADIUS library.  You should not use this RADIUS library in
 packages unrelated to MIT Kerberos.
```

It looks like that was added as a result of dealing with Debian bug
#735323[1], which is what introduced the libkrad-dev package in
Debian.

Currently in Ubuntu (and likely Debian, I haven't checked) libkrad0
has only krb5 itself has a reverse dependency[3], and this change will
make sssd a new rdep.

Is that notice in libkrad-dev's package description still current, and
external projects shouldn't link with libkrad0? What's the reasoning?
Or is that no longer relevant?

I'm CCing package maintainers who might not be subscribed to
sssd-devel, please include them in any replies if you can.


1. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/krb5/-/blob/master/debian/control#L471
2. https://www.debian.org/Bugs/#735323
3.
https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.jamm...

[Alexey Tikhonov]

Hi,

On Mon, Jun 20, 2022 at 5:19 PM Andreas Hasenack <andreas(a)canonical.com&gt; wrote:
>  Hi,
>
>  I was reviewing an Ubuntu merge of sssd 2.7.1 
As a side note: it's better to skip 2.7.1 altogether as it has a
serious regression and to use sssd-2.7.2


>  and saw that the new
>  sssd-idp package links with MIT kerberos libkrad0. libkrad-dev in
>  Debian has this notice in its description[1]:
>  ```
>   This package includes development headers for libkrad0, the MIT
>   Kerberos RADIUS library.  You should not use this RADIUS library in
>   packages unrelated to MIT Kerberos.
>  ``` 
JFTR, 'sssd-idp' ships a new Kerberos plugin
('sssd_krb5_idp_plugin.so') so in this sense "related" to MIT
Kerberos.

>  It looks like that was added as a result of dealing with Debian bug
>  #735323[1], which is what introduced the libkrad-dev package in
>  Debian.
>
>  Currently in Ubuntu (and likely Debian, I haven't checked) libkrad0
>  has only krb5 itself has a reverse dependency[3], and this change will
>  make sssd a new rdep.
>
>  Is that notice in libkrad-dev's package description still current, and
>  external projects shouldn't link with libkrad0? What's the reasoning?
>  Or is that no longer relevant?
>
>  I'm CCing package maintainers who might not be subscribed to
>  sssd-devel, please include them in any replies if you can.
>
>
>  1. https://salsa.debian.org/debian/krb5/-/blob/master/debian/control#L471
>  2. https://www.debian.org/Bugs/#735323
>  3.
> https://people.canonical.com/~ubuntu-archive/germinate-output/ubuntu.jamm...