8:01 a.m.
Hi again,
What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for Fedora 17 rawhide.
Thanks in advance, again
Marco
--
_________________________________________
Non è forte chi non cade, ma chi cadendo ha la forza di rialzarsi.
Jim Morrison
8:05 a.m.
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
Hi again,
What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for Fedora 17 rawhide.
Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed to be pushed to
updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should turn up in the
updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
Please test them and give them karma at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
8:15 a.m.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
> Hi again,
> What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for Fedora 17 rawhide.
Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed to be pushed to
updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should turn up in the
updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
Please test them and give them karma at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
Ok, I will do it in the next days.
By looking at the roadmap I can see that version 1.8 is planned for the end
of February.
When it will be ready, are its rpms going to be built for Fedora 16 too?
Thanks again
Marco
_______________________________________________
sssd-devel mailing list
sssd-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/sssd-devel
--
_________________________________________
Non è forte chi non cade, ma chi cadendo ha la forza di rialzarsi.
Jim Morrison
8:28 a.m.
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:15 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher
<sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
> Hi again,
> What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for Fedora
17 rawhide.
Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed to be
pushed to
updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should turn up in
the
updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
Please test them and give them karma at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
Ok, I will do it in the next days.
By looking at the roadmap I can see that version 1.8 is planned for
the end of February.
When it will be ready, are its rpms going to be built for Fedora 16
too?
We'll be releasing 1.7.91 (aka 1.8.0 beta 1) on February 6th. It will be
built and submitted to the updates-testing repository for F16 and should
be available on February 7th. Once the final release is available at the
end of February, it will also be built for F16.
4:10 a.m.
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli <marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com>wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> > Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for Fedora 17 rawhide.
>
>
> Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed to be pushed to
> updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should turn up in the
> updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
>
> Please test them and give them karma at
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
>
Ok, I will do it in the next days.
I hope to be of help in reporting this.
By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
* '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules in ldap
* *Not built by default*
* Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
(Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options] (0x0400):
Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
(Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init] (0x4000):
SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider [ldap].
6:42 a.m.
On Tue, Feb 07, 2012 at 11:10:20AM +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli
<marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com>
wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
> Hi again,
> What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for Fedora 17
rawhide.
Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed to be pushed to
updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should turn up in the
updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
Please test them and give them karma at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
Ok, I will do it in the next days.
I hope to be of help in reporting this.
By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
* '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules in
ldap
* Not built by default
* Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
(Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options] (0x0400):
Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
(Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init] (0x4000):
SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider [ldap].
This is harmless, the SSSD is just telling that the back end module
contains sudo support[1]. Unless you actually configure the sudo provider
and the sudo client binary, nothing is using it.
[1] In more technical terms, that the shared library contains the symbol
"ssm_ldap_sudo_init" which can be loaded with dlsym()
7:03 a.m.
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:10 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli
<marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher
<sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli
wrote:
> Hi again,
> What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for
Fedora 17 rawhide.
Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed
to be pushed to
updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should
turn up in the
updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
Please test them and give them karma at
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
Ok, I will do it in the next days.
I hope to be of help in reporting this.
By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
* '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules in ldap
* Not built by default
* Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
(Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options]
(0x0400): Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
(Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init]
(0x4000): SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider
[ldap].
That was a bug in the 1.7.0 release that was fixed in 1.8.0beta1.
However, the Fedora packages for 1.8.0beta1 do have the experimental
features enabled for testing.
7:21 a.m.
Dne 7.2.2012 14:03, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:10 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli
> <marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli
> wrote:
> > Hi again,
> > What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
> > Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for
> Fedora 17 rawhide.
>
>
>
> Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed
> to be pushed to
> updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should
> turn up in the
> updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
>
> Please test them and give them karma at
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
>
> Ok, I will do it in the next days.
>
>
>
> I hope to be of help in reporting this.
> By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
>
> * '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules in
ldap
> * Not built by default
> * Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
>
> So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
> sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
>
> (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options]
> (0x0400): Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
> (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init]
> (0x4000): SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider
> [ldap].
That was a bug in the 1.7.0 release that was fixed in 1.8.0beta1.
However, the Fedora packages for 1.8.0beta1 do have the experimental
features enabled for testing.
Not exactly. The back end will still try to load sudo/autofs/ssh but the
providers does not support it and the responders are not built (without
proper configure flag).
7:25 a.m.
On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 14:21 +0100, Pavel Březina wrote:
Dne 7.2.2012 14:03, Stephen Gallagher napsal(a):
> On Tue, 2012-02-07 at 11:10 +0100, Marco Pizzoli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:15 PM, Marco Pizzoli
>> <marco.pizzoli(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jan 30, 2012 at 3:05 PM, Stephen Gallagher
>> <sgallagh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 15:01 +0100, Marco Pizzoli
>> wrote:
>> > Hi again,
>> > What if I wish to play with sssd 1.7 on Fedora 16?
>> > Are rpms available somewhere? I only find those for
>> Fedora 17 rawhide.
>>
>>
>>
>> Sorry, the RPMs for SSSD 1.7.0 in Fedora were supposed
>> to be pushed to
>> updates-testing, but I made a mistake. They should
>> turn up in the
>> updates-testing repo sometime tomorrow.
>>
>> Please test them and give them karma at
>>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0237/sssd-1.7.0-1.fc16
>>
>> Ok, I will do it in the next days.
>>
>>
>>
>> I hope to be of help in reporting this.
>> By looking at the 1.7 release announcement I see this:
>>
>> * '''Experimental''' support for looking up SUDO rules
in ldap
>> * Not built by default
>> * Requires unreleased sudo binary. Very preliminary functionality.
>>
>> So I'm surprised in seeing these lines of output during my
>> sssd-1.7.0-5.fc16.x86_64 startup:
>>
>> (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [dp_get_options]
>> (0x0400): Option ldap_sudo_search_base has value (null)
>> (Tue Feb 7 11:07:25 2012) [sssd[be[my_ldap]]] [be_process_init]
>> (0x4000): SUDO backend target successfully loaded from provider
>> [ldap].
>
> That was a bug in the 1.7.0 release that was fixed in 1.8.0beta1.
> However, the Fedora packages for 1.8.0beta1 do have the experimental
> features enabled for testing.
Not exactly. The back end will still try to load sudo/autofs/ssh but the
providers does not support it and the responders are not built (without
proper configure flag).
Thanks for the clarification. Either way, as I said: the Fedora packages
will build with --enable-all-experimental-features.
4487
days inactive
4495
days old
sssd-devel@lists.fedorahosted.org
8 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Jakub Hrozek -
Marco Pizzoli -
Pavel Březina -
Stephen Gallagher