On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 11:18:02PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote:
> On 01/17/2013 04:15 PM, Dan Kenigsberg wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 10:20:12PM -0500, Itamar Heim wrote:
>>> i tried running nightly engine (well, since 3.2 beta repo still
>>> contains an old version).
>> >from beta repo i got this vdsm version:
>>> vdsm-4.10.3-4.fc18.x86_64
>>>
>>> it doesn't contain latest getHardwareInfo which engine expects[1]
>>> i enabled the nightly repo, expecting a newer vdsm, but nightly has
>>> vdsm versions of vdsm-4.10.3-0.87
>>>
>>> I assume -4 in beta isn't getting replaced by -0.87?
>>
>> Indeed. Nightlies are build from master branch. ovirt-3.2 would be built
> >from ovirt-3.2 branch.
>
> then shouldn't master move to a newer version (3.3 for engine soon,
> 4.11 for vdsm?)
We'd move to 4.11 when we have something substantial - such as basic
amqp binding. 4.10.3 was a special bump for ovirt-3.2. Too bad that it
takes us so long to stabilize ovirt-3.2 and that another bump may be
required to avoid condusion.
>
>>
>>>
>>> so which vdsm version are we using for 3.2 beta?
>>>
>>> [1]2013-01-17 15:15:53,222 ERROR
>>> [org.ovirt.engine.core.vdsbroker.vdsbroker.VdsBrokerCommand]
>>> (QuartzScheduler_Worker-65) XML RPC error in command
>>> GetHardwareInfoVDS ( HostName =
>>> local_host ), the error was:
>>> java.util.concurrent.ExecutionException:
>>> java.lang.reflect.InvocationTargetException,<type
>>> 'exceptions.Exception'>:method "getVdsHardwareInfo" is
>>> not supported
>>
>> getVdsHardwareInfo (
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/9258/) has not been
>> backported to the ovirt-3.2 branch; I do not see that it has even been
>> proposed. I suppose Yaniv (or someone) should do it.
>>
>> We still do not have a sane build for ovirt-3.2. On top of
>> getVdsHardwareInfo we have
>> bz 886087 Rest query add storage domain fails on fedora18: missing
/sbin/scsi_id
>> and
http://gerrit.ovirt.org/#/c/10758/ (udev: Race fix- load and trigger
>> dev rule) that blocks block storage.
>>
>> I told Douglas today that before these are fixed, there is no hurry for
>> another build.
>
> agree, but in general we need this build is we were supposed to have
> had the beta build by now...
Douglas has built vdsm-4.10.3-5.fc18
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=379346
with fixes that SHOULD make ovirt-3.2 work with NFS.
I'd appreciate any attempt to test All-in-One and ovirt-node
registration with it.
People that would like to test the new package it's available on
updates-testing repo on F18.
# yum --enablerepo=updates-testing install vdsm
--
Cheers
Douglas