Re: [vdsm] VDSM - top 10 with patches with no activity for more than 30 days
On Thu, 2013-02-28 at 12:51 -0500, Doron Fediuck wrote:
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Itamar Heim" <iheim(a)redhat.com>
> To: vdsm-devel(a)lists.fedorahosted.org
> Sent: Wednesday, February 20, 2013 5:39:21 PM
> Subject: [vdsm] VDSM - top 10 with patches with no activity for more than 30 days
>
> thoughts on how to trim these?
> (in openstack gerrit they auto-abandon patches with no activity for a
> couple of weeks - author can revive them back when they are relevant)
>
> preferred_email | count
> ----------------------------+------
> fsimonce(a)redhat.com | 34
> smizrahi(a)redhat.com | 23
> lvroyce(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com | 13
> ewarszaw(a)redhat.com | 12
> wudxw(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com | 12
> xuhj(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com | 11
> shaohef(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com | 6
> lilei(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com | 6
> zhshzhou(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com | 6
> shuming(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com | 5
> _______________________________________________
Review day? Anyone thinks a monthly review day will
help?
We've discussed this in the past and part of the reason for the backlog
is that folks like Saggi and Federico like to use gerrit to store
work-in-progress patches that don't need review. They may not be
working on those patches at the moment but want them in gerrit for them
to come back to. If we want to allow this use of gerrit then we will
always have some stale patches lying around.
--
Adam Litke <agl(a)linux.vnet.ibm.com>
IBM Linux Technology Center