8:22 a.m.
I just submitted this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753437
Apparently Windows XP thinks the video hardware has changed
on fedora 16 host (I was using qxl and spice on fedora 15 host).
If this is expected rather than a bug, which drivers do I
install to made XP happy when hosted on fedora 16?
The Windows XP machine on fedora 15 currently has the
Red Hat QXL GPU version 1.4.1.0 (9/29/2010) video
driver.
11:19 a.m.
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:22:27AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
I just submitted this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753437
Apparently Windows XP thinks the video hardware has changed
on fedora 16 host (I was using qxl and spice on fedora 15 host).
If this is expected rather than a bug, which drivers do I
install to made XP happy when hosted on fedora 16?
The Windows XP machine on fedora 15 currently has the
Red Hat QXL GPU version 1.4.1.0 (9/29/2010) video
driver.
That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3, I need to
fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M something.
The driver on spice-space should work with rev=3 as well as rev=2.
_______________________________________________
virt mailing list
virt(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt
12:35 p.m.
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:19:35 +0200
Alon Levy wrote:
That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3, I
need to
fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M something.
The driver on spice-space should work with rev=3 as well as rev=2.
Sounds like another thing that ought to be included in the xml
along with all the other details like pci slot numbers, etc.
I only have the 1 XP virtual machine, but I can imagine
great unhappiness if someone upgraded a host with 1000 of
them :-).
3:54 a.m.
On 11/12/2011 08:35 PM, Tom Horsley wrote:
On Sat, 12 Nov 2011 19:19:35 +0200
Alon Levy wrote:
> That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3, I need to
> fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M something.
> The driver on spice-space should work with rev=3 as well as rev=2.
Sounds like another thing that ought to be included in the xml
The machine type is included in the xml.
It controls the virtual hardware compatibility level and map it to a
certain release.
along with all the other details like pci slot numbers, etc.
I only have the 1 XP virtual machine, but I can imagine
great unhappiness if someone upgraded a host with 1000 of
them :-).
_______________________________________________
virt mailing list
virt(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt
7:50 a.m.
I've added to the bugzilla another incompatibility I found:
The xml definition I copied from fedora 15 includes an ac97
sound device, but I eventually discovered the Xp KVM running
on the fedora 16 host did not believe any sound hardware
was available.
Inside the XP VM I had to go to device manager and tell it
to scan for hardware changes before the ac97 device appeared.
4:29 a.m.
On 11/12/2011 07:19 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:22:27AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> I just submitted this bug:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753437
>
> Apparently Windows XP thinks the video hardware has changed
> on fedora 16 host (I was using qxl and spice on fedora 15 host).
>
> If this is expected rather than a bug, which drivers do I
> install to made XP happy when hosted on fedora 16?
>
> The Windows XP machine on fedora 15 currently has the
> Red Hat QXL GPU version 1.4.1.0 (9/29/2010) video
> driver.
That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3, I need to
fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M something.
This needs to be done real quick.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
6:41 a.m.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:29:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/12/2011 07:19 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:22:27AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > I just submitted this bug:
> >
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753437
> >
> > Apparently Windows XP thinks the video hardware has changed
> > on fedora 16 host (I was using qxl and spice on fedora 15 host).
> >
> > If this is expected rather than a bug, which drivers do I
> > install to made XP happy when hosted on fedora 16?
> >
> > The Windows XP machine on fedora 15 currently has the
> > Red Hat QXL GPU version 1.4.1.0 (9/29/2010) video
> > driver.
>
> That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3, I need to
> fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M something.
>
This needs to be done real quick.
So I want all machines < pc-1.0 to use rev=2 by default, and pc-1.0 to
have rev=3 by default?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
6:48 a.m.
On 11/13/2011 02:41 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:29:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/12/2011 07:19 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:22:27AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > I just submitted this bug:
> > >
> > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753437
> > >
> > > Apparently Windows XP thinks the video hardware has changed
> > > on fedora 16 host (I was using qxl and spice on fedora 15 host).
> > >
> > > If this is expected rather than a bug, which drivers do I
> > > install to made XP happy when hosted on fedora 16?
> > >
> > > The Windows XP machine on fedora 15 currently has the
> > > Red Hat QXL GPU version 1.4.1.0 (9/29/2010) video
> > > driver.
> >
> > That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3, I need to
> > fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M something.
> >
>
> This needs to be done real quick.
So I want all machines < pc-1.0 to use rev=2 by default, and pc-1.0 to
have rev=3 by default?
Yes. But what about all guests already created with 0.15? If it's just
Fedora, then there's a small number of them hopefully. But we can't be
sure of it.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
8 a.m.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 02:48:32PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/13/2011 02:41 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:29:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 11/12/2011 07:19 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:22:27AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > > I just submitted this bug:
> > > >
> > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753437
> > > >
> > > > Apparently Windows XP thinks the video hardware has changed
> > > > on fedora 16 host (I was using qxl and spice on fedora 15 host).
> > > >
> > > > If this is expected rather than a bug, which drivers do I
> > > > install to made XP happy when hosted on fedora 16?
> > > >
> > > > The Windows XP machine on fedora 15 currently has the
> > > > Red Hat QXL GPU version 1.4.1.0 (9/29/2010) video
> > > > driver.
> > >
> > > That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3, I need to
> > > fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M
something.
> > >
> >
> > This needs to be done real quick.
>
> So I want all machines < pc-1.0 to use rev=2 by default, and pc-1.0 to
> have rev=3 by default?
Yes. But what about all guests already created with 0.15? If it's just
Fedora, then there's a small number of them hopefully. But we can't be
sure of it.
Going after each distribution that packages qemu? No way to do this, I
can just hope any packager who encounters this problem comes to
spice-devel/qemu-devel.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
8:03 a.m.
On 11/13/2011 04:00 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 02:48:32PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> On 11/13/2011 02:41 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:29:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > On 11/12/2011 07:19 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:22:27AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > > > I just submitted this bug:
> > > > >
> > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753437
> > > > >
> > > > > Apparently Windows XP thinks the video hardware has changed
> > > > > on fedora 16 host (I was using qxl and spice on fedora 15
host).
> > > > >
> > > > > If this is expected rather than a bug, which drivers do I
> > > > > install to made XP happy when hosted on fedora 16?
> > > > >
> > > > > The Windows XP machine on fedora 15 currently has the
> > > > > Red Hat QXL GPU version 1.4.1.0 (9/29/2010) video
> > > > > driver.
> > > >
> > > > That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3, I
need to
> > > > fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M
something.
> > > >
> > >
> > > This needs to be done real quick.
> >
> > So I want all machines < pc-1.0 to use rev=2 by default, and pc-1.0 to
> > have rev=3 by default?
>
> Yes. But what about all guests already created with 0.15? If it's just
> Fedora, then there's a small number of them hopefully. But we can't be
> sure of it.
Going after each distribution that packages qemu? No way to do this, I
can just hope any packager who encounters this problem comes to
spice-devel/qemu-devel.
I'm talking about guests. Images created with 0.15 know that rev=3,
with 1.0 (or 0.15.next) they'll be back to rev=2.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
8:17 a.m.
On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 04:03:56PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
On 11/13/2011 04:00 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 02:48:32PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > On 11/13/2011 02:41 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 12:29:01PM +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
> > > > On 11/12/2011 07:19 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > > > > On Sat, Nov 12, 2011 at 09:22:27AM -0500, Tom Horsley wrote:
> > > > > > I just submitted this bug:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=753437
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Apparently Windows XP thinks the video hardware has
changed
> > > > > > on fedora 16 host (I was using qxl and spice on fedora 15
host).
> > > > > >
> > > > > > If this is expected rather than a bug, which drivers do I
> > > > > > install to made XP happy when hosted on fedora 16?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The Windows XP machine on fedora 15 currently has the
> > > > > > Red Hat QXL GPU version 1.4.1.0 (9/29/2010) video
> > > > > > driver.
> > > > >
> > > > > That's because it has. We changed the revision from 2 to 3,
I need to
> > > > > fix that I guess - make sure it doesn't change if you use -M
something.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > This needs to be done real quick.
> > >
> > > So I want all machines < pc-1.0 to use rev=2 by default, and pc-1.0 to
> > > have rev=3 by default?
> >
> > Yes. But what about all guests already created with 0.15? If it's just
> > Fedora, then there's a small number of them hopefully. But we can't
be
> > sure of it.
>
> Going after each distribution that packages qemu? No way to do this, I
> can just hope any packager who encounters this problem comes to
> spice-devel/qemu-devel.
>
>
I'm talking about guests. Images created with 0.15 know that rev=3,
with 1.0 (or 0.15.next) they'll be back to rev=2.
Ok, my mistake. So yes, there will now be both pc-0.14 with rev 3 and
2. For migrations there is no problem since the revision is migrated
(since it could be set from the command line anyway). Otherwise, doing
a shutdown, upgrading qemu, and starting the vm again - yes. Other then
"this should never have happened" any suggestions?
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
_______________________________________________
virt mailing list
virt(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/virt
8:33 a.m.
On 11/13/2011 04:17 PM, Alon Levy wrote:
> > Going after each distribution that packages qemu? No way to
do this, I
> > can just hope any packager who encounters this problem comes to
> > spice-devel/qemu-devel.
> >
> >
>
> I'm talking about guests. Images created with 0.15 know that rev=3,
> with 1.0 (or 0.15.next) they'll be back to rev=2.
>
Ok, my mistake. So yes, there will now be both pc-0.14 with rev 3 and
2. For migrations there is no problem since the revision is migrated
(since it could be set from the command line anyway). Otherwise, doing
a shutdown, upgrading qemu, and starting the vm again - yes. Other then
"this should never have happened" any suggestions?
No. Clever ideas welcome. Also about "this will never happen again".
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
4547
days inactive
4548
days old
11 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Alon Levy -
Avi Kivity -
Dor Laor -
Tom Horsley