[389-devel] [389-users] git repo / tarball issues

[Noriko Hosoi]

Hi Timo,

Timo Aaltonen wrote:
>
>> 1) 389-ds-console 1.2.7 has no tarball though it was tagged for release
>> in Sep'12
>> You can download the tar ball from here now.
>> http://port389.org/sources/389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2
> Cool, thanks. It's a broken tarball though, you forgot '/' after the
> version..
Sorry.  I've fixed it...  Could you please try it, one more time?

    tar tvjf 389-ds-console-1.2.7.tar.bz2
    drwxrwxr-x root/root         0 2012-09-17 13:03 389-ds-console-1.2.7/
    -rw-rw-r-- root/root        35 2012-09-17 13:03
    389-ds-console-1.2.7/.gitignore
    -rw-rw-r-- root/root      4628 2012-09-17 13:03
    389-ds-console-1.2.7/389-ds-console.spec
    -rw-rw-r-- root/root     12279 2012-09-17 13:03
    389-ds-console-1.2.7/LICENSE
    -rwxrwxr-x root/root      1002 2012-09-17 13:03
    389-ds-console-1.2.7/build.properties

> Also, you still need some way to fix the process of how these links get
> to the webpage too :)
Yeah, that's what I thought, too.   I searched an existing page on 
http://directory.fedoraproject.org, but I could not find it.

Rich, could there be a good place to put the link(s)?
>>>> 2) 389-adminutil 1.1.20 is not tagged in git
>>> Looks like it is, according to
>>> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/
>> Rich, I cannot see the tag, either...  *puzzled*
>>
>>      $ git pull
>>      Already up-to-date.
>>      $ git tag -l | egrep 389-adminutil
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.10
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.11
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.12
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.13
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.14
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.15
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.16
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.17
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.18
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.19
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.8
>>      389-adminutil-1.1.9
>>
>> although indeed this page
>> https://git.fedorahosted.org/cgit/389/adminutil.git/ shows it is...
>> Timo, you could download the zip file/tar ball that has the tag from
>> here.  So, you have no problem to continue your task?
> I've used the release tarball and packaging is on 9b3cfced24ffe6e6e from
> master, so I'm good.. just wondered why the tag wasn't there but it was.
>
>>>> 3) 389-ds-base repo seems to be in limbo, since 1.3.2 branch doesn't
>>>> have the latest release, which itself was just 1.3.2.13+ one patch, so
>>>> doesn't contain changes from .14 and .15. So which one am I supposed to
>>>> push to the distro?
>> 389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 is a security fix only release.  It's branched from
>> the stable build (1.3.2.13) and it has only the fix.  The tag
>> 389-ds-base-1.3.2.16 tag is on the 389-ds-base-1.3.2-CVE-2014-0132
>> branch.  Once we finish more testing, we are going back to the normal
>> branch 389-ds-base-1.3.2.  Sorry about this confusion.
> ahh ok, I'll just rebase on .16 then.
>
> Now I see that you have a separate 389-announce list where only the
> stable releases get announced.. maybe send those to 389-users too?
All right.  I will do so from the next time.  Thanks for your suggestion!
--noriko
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-devel/attachments/20140404/5d630646/attachment-0001.html>