[Fedora-directory-users] Performance

[Vampire D]

I was under the impression FDS was better implementation than OpenLDAP in
terms of Performance, Reliability, and especially replication?

On 7/21/07, Gordon Messmer <yinyang at eburg.com> wrote:
>
> Richard Megginson wrote:
> > Vampire D wrote:
> >> As I understand it, OpenLDAP doesn't perform all that well under a
> >> high load.
> > OpenLDAP 2.3 does.
>
> Howard Chu's "SambaXP" key notes certainly seem to make that argument.
> He makes the bold claim that "OpenLDAP is the only directory software
> that matters."
>
> Do you agree?  Is there a future for Fedora DS, or will OpenLDAP own the
> Free Software directory service market?  Will the two projects share
> technology and converge?
>
>
> --
> Fedora-directory-users mailing list
> Fedora-directory-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>



-- 
"Do the actors on Unsolved Mysteries ever get arrested because they look
just like the criminal they are playing?"

Christopher
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20070721/e523134a/attachment.html>