[389-users] Latest Fedora/389 releases

[Rich Megginson]

Techie wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Rich Megginson<rmeggins at redhat.com> wrote:
>   
>> Techie wrote:
>>     
>>> I have what I think is a valid question regarding this..
>>>
>>> So say I have my FC8 box acting as one of two MMR members and the CA
>>> for all my SSL operations including replication and client access.
>>>
>>> What is the safe process to upgrade/rebuild the box to FC11 and keep
>>> replication agreements and the SSL certs valid or intact. The
>>> replication agreements are all over SSL and the certs were issued by
>>> this machine. If I take this box down to rebuild/upgrade, the certs
>>> will be invalid in my environment correct?
>>>       
>> Why would they be invalid?
>>     
> Well it may be just a lack of understanding on my part.
> My thinking was that this host issued all the SSL certs and I would be
> rebuilding the box, this in turn may adversely effect the SSL
> communications. Judging from your response I assume this is incorrect.
> All hosts involved in replication have the CA cert and their server
> certs (both issued from this box) in their certificate stores. Because
> of this perhaps the SSL communication will still function normally.
Yes.
> I
> have an idea of what I need to do. I will do some research/testing and
> see how things go.
>   
I think everything should continue to work fine.
> Thank you
>
>
>   
>>> How would one handle this?
>>>
>>> Thank you
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 8:36 AM, Rich Megginson<rmeggins at redhat.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> sigid at JINLab wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Rich Megginson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Techie wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>>>> Rich, list,
>>>>>>> These are the packages I have installed. Are these the latest for
>>>>>>> Fedora 9?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>               
>>>>>> Yes, these are the latest.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Note that Fedora 9 is soon scheduled for EOL - we will not be releasing
>>>>>> any more updates for Fedora 9.  I suggest an upgrade to F-10 or F-11
>>>>>> ASAP.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> 1. What could happen if we don't upgrade to fedora 10 or fedora 11?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> You won't get any updates of 389 (fedora ds) - unless you build it
>>>> yourself.
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> 2. Is there any prediction on when the 389DS will be release?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> We're working on it - Real Soon Now - we just recently had the 389
>>>> packages
>>>> approved for Fedora (even though it was essentially just renaming the
>>>> packages from Fedora DS to 389, we still had to go through the entire new
>>>> package review process . . .)
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> --
>>>> 389 users mailing list
>>>> 389-users at redhat.com
>>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> --
>>> 389 users mailing list
>>> 389-users at redhat.com
>>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>>
>>>       
>> --
>> 389 users mailing list
>> 389-users at redhat.com
>> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>>
>>
>>     
>
> --
> 389 users mailing list
> 389-users at redhat.com
> https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-directory-users
>   

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: smime.p7s
Type: application/x-pkcs7-signature
Size: 3258 bytes
Desc: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
URL: <http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/389-users/attachments/20090723/88f928f8/attachment.bin>